A Life without Choice , let alone, ‘Independence’

article-1392892-0C588EA900000578-684_468x286

The Law on Capacity

The Mental Capacity Act 2005, purported to empower.

The Act, presumes, everyone,  is capable of making a particular decision, until, there is evidence, on the balance of probabilities, by a prescribed assessment,  that, they are not.

As a capacity assessment,  removes a person’s fundamental freedom to  choose.

It should only be undertaken, if ‘incapacity’ is suspected.

And, must only be  of  a person’s ability, to  make a specific decision, at the time that decision needs to be made,  in his best interest.

This assessment,  or, suspicion of incapacity, must not be based, on a person’s mental condition and/or presentation.

Further, the Act’s overarching principle provides;

A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision unless all practicable steps to help him to do so have been taken without success’

S1(3), and, see also s3(2) MCA.

This requires, as much as possible , to be done,  to maximise a person’s capacity to make the particular decision.

And, to avoid Article 12 EU illegality, ‘substitute decision making’, a joint decision, should be attempted before capacity is assessed.

Assessments, should take place, in a familiar place, and, be by a familiar person.

With the assesse, in optimum physical, and emotional health.

Unless in an emergency situation.

An assessment , can only, relate to a person’s capacity, at any particular time.

Capacity to make, a decision, can be regained.

The Mental Capacity Act, is the only Act, as far as I am aware, that allows, the state, to remove a person’s autonomy.

Prior to 2007, the High Court had such power, but, only if, necessary, in a person’s best interest, and, it was used, exceptionally.

Decisions of the autistic, and vulnerable, were generally made by them, with the help, and, protection of their family.

The Reality Since 2007

As early as year 9, parents, will be introduced to a person from ‘Transitions’, at their child’s SEN review.

This person’s function, will not be explained, other than,  autistics/ learning disabled,  find ‘transition’ to adulthood difficult, and, they are there to help.

At 16, your child’s full time school, is no longer funded.

Despite SEN ‘Education’ funding continuing until 25.

Instead, independent living, and employability skills are taught, and, a base building provided.

Most children attending a special school, will automatically, be deemed ‘incapable’, of making  decisions, as to their welfare,  and, finances, by social workers, and GPs  .

As these assessments, are neither time, nor decision specific, and, usually based on their  conditions of autism, and/ or, presentation,  they are illegal.

Even if, a formal capacity test, is undertaken, it appears, it need not be completed, as required by the Act, as the standard Local Authority Assessment Form provides;

The assessment should end if the person is unable to progress through the functional test. For example if a person cannot understand the decision they will not be able to retain it, weigh it in the balance or meaningfully communicate a decision’.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/03/03/standard-capacity-assessments-stephen-hawking-would-fail-without-his-box/

All that needs to happen, is a person be asked ,  do  you know why, you need your medication, or, do you know why you need to pay your disability allowance into your own bank account.

And, show no understanding, and, their reaction noted.

So, effectively, once a person has, an’ impairment of mind’, which the Act makes non- exhaustive, and extensive,Unless, they are a good communicators, with knowledge of modern procedures, and medicines, they are doomed.

It must also be considered, how many non- SEN teenagers, would be able to answer  such questions.

As this standard LA test, is neither time, nor decision  specific, needed, and, can only, if abandoned so early, be based on a person’s condition, and/or presentation, it  is illegal under the Act.

Protection of your child’s ‘rights’,will be tick boxed, by the appointment of his own Independent Mental Capacity Advocate.

Whose only function, is to  explain what is happening to him, and his rights.

Quite what these rights are, is unknown, as the incapable, do not appear to have any under the Act, other than, to consultation.

And, your child’s ‘Advocate’, despite his name, cannot take part, in the decision making process.

At 17, you will be consulted about your child’s, away from home for life placement, but, at 18, it is ‘inappropriate’ for you to make decisions for him, and, you have no right to do so.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/07/07/autistic-parents-have-no-rights-and-the-private-corporate-parent-is-unaccountable/

As your child, lacks the capacity, to make his own  decisions, adult social services, will  make them, and, decide what placement is, in his ‘ best interests ‘.

If  you object, to your child living ‘independently’, or, are unhappy with the chosen placement, the LA will make an application to the Court of Protection,  as your child is ‘incapable’ of choosing where he lives.

If you insist he is capable, and wants to live at home,  the court, will declare, your child ‘incapable’ of all decisions, past, present and future,  and, that it is, in his  best interests, to live in whatever placement, the LA provide.

All his future decisions, will then be dictated by his Care Plan.

Even down to how many baths he has, when he takes them, and, how he is cleaned.

Subject to reviews, this will be, for the rest of his life.

This is his ‘independence’, and, empowerment.

The need for a Deprivation of Liberty Order each time a person is locked in his room or supported living facility is not required by the MCA.

So, despite the Magna Carta, Human Rights Act, Equality Act, Disability Discrimination Act and United Nations Convention, millions, now, and in the future, will be encaged without due process.

A Horrifying Abuse Scandal

And, Supported/independent living, is now, the only policy, and support provided by Social Services.

The House of Lords Select Committee on Mental Capacity Act 05  report

Extract from Hansard on no monitoring of substitute decision making by care provision.

98.  There were also concerns that a decision-maker could assume too much power, and sometimes on the basis of questionable legal authority.

Sheffield Safeguarding Adults Board pointed out that

once a person has been deemed to lack capacity to make a decision they become vulnerable to the opinion of the decision-maker and when those decisions are not reflective of their best interests it often leaves them powerless to challenge“.[157]

This was echoed by other witnesses, who expressed concern over the use of the ‘general defence’—the term often used to describe sections 5 and 6 of the Act (Acts in connection with care or treatment and Section 5 Acts: limitations)—which provides protection from liability for carers and others to carry out acts in relation to a person who lacks capacity.

The pre-legislative scrutiny committee foresaw problems with these sections, which were at the time entitled ‘the general authority’.

They worried that it would wrongly give the “impression that the general authority would be assumed by a single individual who would then take all decisions on behalf of an incapacitated individual”.[158]

In response, the Government removed the term ‘general authority’ from the Bill, but concerns have persisted since implementation.

Now irrelevant as DOLs replaced by Liberty Safeguards, 2019, which allow LA and Care Company to do anything in best interests and avoid liability for such action.

Professor Phil Fennell and Dr Lucy Series described the general defence as providing “tremendous discretionary power” which was “not subject to any routine monitoring”.[159]

Liberty expressed concern about the very wide range of decisions which could be made under these sections, combined with a “worrying lack of oversight”.

And these decisions, are being made on a business efficiency model, in secret, by large private monopoly care/ supported living provision, with no oversight by the courts, only the Adult Services Managers,  employed by the LA, who commissioned the service, and, would therefore, be liable for its inadequacy, so a huge conflict of interests.http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/11/17/severely-disabled-mans-care-plan-is-not-a-deprivation-of-liberty-says-court-of-appeal/

Profitable Retardation of the Autistic ? Learning ‘Difficulty’ conflated to ‘Disability’.

Einstein

As Liverpool Health NHS Foundation Trust opens new learning disabled hospital

Plans approved for new learning disabilities hospital in Merseyside

We must ask why learning disability is now a physical illness and those with these difficculty are put in hospitals.

Could be the £13,000 A WEEK per patient paid by NHS

Autism, despite its  vague, non pathological definition.

And  vague criteria  diagnoses- lack of imagination and social communication.

Is the UK’s most costly medical condition.

http://www.lse.ac.uk/newsAndMedia/news/archives/2014/06/Autism.aspx

Why ?

Because, ‘autism’ is so vague  it is the ultimate cash cow.

Despite treatment having little effect.

Analysis finds weak evidence for most autism treatments

And with the billions ploughed into the industry  outcomes for the autistic are  now dire- medication damage, early death and institutionalisation for life.

The autism industry has built a lucrative empire by autism  awareness, detection, and diagnosis.

I always worried about the more intelligent, and/or less obedient 3 year old, who did not knock on the ‘special box’ three times, when told to, to get the toy out.

Or went to find, where a toy actually was, rather than, where the other child, who had not seen it being hidden, would have, thought it was.

Who were diagnosed autistic on such tests.

Screen-shot-2015-08-11-at-11_42_33And wondered if this really did indicate a lack of empathy?.

We all have autistic genes.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/308185.php

Autism is now being detected in babies,

http://www.nhs.uk/news/2013/11November/Pages/Can-autism-really-be-detected-in-babies.aspx

And, those just ‘At risk ,‘ presumably with autism in their family, are singled out.

At risk of what ?

Something with no pathology, no definition that manifests itself on a spectrum that we are all on.

The intensive hunt for the autistic mirrors that now for Alzheimers.

Our ‘autism friends’, health visitors, nursery schools, GPs, CMHS, Social Services etc.

The diagnosee is a lucrative captive customer, for the autism industry’s ever increasing cabal.

An industry which is PR controlled, with its own experts, managers, qualifications, researchers, guidelines.

That controls the research, the training, the guidelines, the tests, and, even, the definition of autism.

This cabal per se, is lucrative and, as charitable, tax free, and gains more income from students, training, government, and fundraising.

All singing from the same, unquestioned hymn sheet.

The autistic and parents have little input nor do the outcomes for the autistic.

And all are controlled by draconian  Care and Court of Protection MCA orders, that can enforce any treatment/medication/residence/education the cabal want.

Only those few protected, as part of the cabal, or  who escape diagnosis survive.

For the ‘autistic’, the discrimination starts early.

At 4/5, the autistic child is subject, to the same IQ tests, as, a‘normal’ child, for their EHC statement.

No allowance is given for their communication and  attention difference.

http://autism.about.com/od/schoolandsummer/fl/Why-IQ-Tests-May-Not-Tell-You-Much-About-Your-Child-with-Autism.htm

Which will result in their IQ scores being lower than their actual intelligence..

And, no matter how high their IQ score,  their autism difference  will mean they will have ‘learning difficulties’.

Which is then mislabelled a ‘learning disability’.

No one, distinguishes, the crucial difference.

Disability is the permanent intellectual impairment of having a lower than average intelligence and affects an individual’s capability.

Difficulty is not an intellectual impairment just an acceptance that autism results in a child learning differently.

And will need  more one to one assistance, time to process information, visual aids, and flexible steps for progression.

On this conflation and misunderstanding, inappropriate education is  put in place.

A class room assistant, may teach them, all frogs are green, but the curious intelligent autistic notices they are not.

And, some basics, irrelevant to autistic processing and cannot be learnt justify presumed retardation.

And, as these basics cannot be acquired because of how autistics learn they are not allowed to  progress.

And not encouraged to either, as ever increasing SEN, now EHC funding, would  be removed from their school.

‘Learning disability’, is now termed, ‘intellectual disability’,  the old ‘mental retardation’.

Now deemed an  ‘inapproriate’ term,  as insufficiently PC.

Yet,  substantively/conceptually now forms the basis of an autistics persona, and education.

Yet, there is little evidence for any link between learning disability and autism,

see study in 2009 suggesting little evidence, despite up to 70% of ASD, being now accessed with as learning disabled.http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/195/6/531

This special needs ‘education’ goes hand in hand with behaviour charts.

Such behaviour becoming progressively worse, as the boredom of thwarted curiosity and intelligence, kicks in.

And ADHD, aggression, irritability results and medication is prescribed.

More children than ever in 2016 were put on off label antipsychotics for ADHD

https://www.madinamerica.com/2016/07/more-children-receiving-off-label-antipsychotics-for-adhd/

So the autistic at as young  as 5 can be made pharma cows for life.

See here the pharma role in the creation of ADHD

And now ADHD has been widened to attentive ADHD

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/315359.php

Ritlevin does not work after three years, so stronger more expense antipsychotics are used.

These drugs then actually create a learning disability, pathologically by changing the pathways in the brain, so a once normal brain, with a mere learning difference due to autism becomes learning disabled.

As the effect of the drug reduces  thinking, observation, and motivation.

So, the intelligent, could not improve, even if appropriate education were in place.

Meanwhile, the special needs residential school ,charges £3,500 per week , for its own army of Speech Therapists, Educational Psychologist, Behavioural therapists and specialist teachers.

And make huge profits either for venture capital or recycled to executives if Charitable.

The ‘experts’ mainly manage one to one contact and containment by low wage, itinerant class room teaching assistants.

Why, has no one, ever wondered why, National Autistic Residential Schools, rarely produce 16-18 year old autistics, with a single GCSE?

After,  the equivalent of 5 Eton students fees,of ‘specialist’ input?

Because the autistic are now not taught to National Curriculum in specialist schools, but to specially created P Scale assessment.

At 16, under ECHs schools are no longer funded, instead ‘education packages’ for life skills to train the autistic for their 24/7 surveillance captivity, in ‘independent of family/ community living’ are funded, and this money can be claimed, by  usually residential provider until the autistic is 25.

The autistics’, lack of adaptive skills, tying a shoe lace, changing a battery, organising cupboards, using machines, following instructions, continues the myth of retardation. https://iancommunity.org/ssc/autism-adaptive-skills.

CAMHS treatment and assessment Units require an IQ of 50, or less, yet, there main occupants are non verbal autistics.

The ‘treatment’ consists of antipsychotic medication (illegal, as not short term severe behaviour) which acts as a major neuro depressant/tranquiliser.

Until, at 18, the final insult.

A mental capacity assessor, will deem, on an autistic’s sad lifetime achievements, of at most P scales, and, few adaptive skills.

The MCA assessment will be on adeptive skills not cognitive ability .

The, particularly non verbal autistic, will now be labelled ’ severely intellectually disabled’, regardless of previous IQ .

This label aids, an illegal blanket capacity assessment, that the autistic are so intellectuality impaired, they were never, and will never be, capable of making any decisions.

And , allows the state commissioned, private/charity sector provision, to earn £4,000 per week, for their lifetime encagement, in their ‘best interests’.

Now, that’s  rip off, abuse and discrimination……

15747770_947933215306183_5282025104727343976_n 

Science shows teachers/educationalists.

wronghttp://www.cracked.com/article_20321_5-things-it-turns-out-you-were-right-to-hate-about-school.html

 

 

 

Why are mental health patients herded to St. Andrews, in Northampton ?

Adults and children, are being, forcefully herded, under MHA section/’best interests’ MCA, from all over the UK, to St Andrews Northampton, on the pretext, of no local provision.

http://www.northampton-news-hp.co.uk/Europe-8217-s-largest-mental-health-facility/story-22905825-detail/story.html

The government policy is to phase out all NHS public mental health hospital admissions by 2017, so all will be private.

Anticipating this  multimillion pound units  were built at St Andrews to accommodate  hundreds of under 18s.

Here is a BIJ investigation into their under 18 provision of 110 beds each charging a minimum of £220,000 a year tax  free and parents forced to pay top up fees on top for basic facilities.

https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2017-03-01/patients-at-major-mental-health-hospital-subjected-to-demeaning-conditions-say-families

St Andrews has the  largest under 18 mental facility in Europe.

Large means more efficient and therefore more profitable.

NHS England are paying this ‘charity’, £5,000, minimum, and yearly increasing, public money per week for each patient.

If under 25, more money can be claimed now under education funding.

Bi polar Sophie is a beautiful 21 year old ‘bi polar’ patient whose Mum  has a facebook and Petition to the PM for her release . Please sign.

https://www.change.org/p/rt-hon-david-cameron-mp-get-sophie-out-of-st-andrews-and-back-to-her-family?recruiter=250538761&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=share_facebook_responsive&utm_term=mob-xs-share_petition-custom_msg

Read the sad story, of a mother miles from her 13 year old autistic daughter Maesie.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/apr/09/children-mental-health-mother-campaign-daughters-side-hospital-unit#comment-50193694

Tom Costello, at 72, found himself being driven 100 miles from Hampstead, against his, and his family’s wishes, and detained illegally, for four months, because, St Andrews, was the only place, his difficulty, with the, most common form of dementia, could be contained.

A dementia spokeswoman commented, that such a patient, should be able to be treated at home.

http://www.camdennewjournal.com/news/2010/oct/%E2%80%98bring-our-tom-costello-home%E2%80%99

And, Tom would still be in St Andrews, but, for his family, and high profile.

http://www.camdennewjournal.com/news/2011/feb/tribunal-rules-tom-costellos-section-order-was-invalid-family-hope-he-may-be-able-come

Tianze, a high functioning autistic, poet, and piano player’s risperidol, was stopped at 16, when he started lactating, resulting in violent episodes.

When Tianze refused an assessment, he was forcefully removed, to Westlane Hospital Middlesbrough, 200 miles, from his home in Scotland.

He was to be sent to St Andrews, even further away, but campaigning, and publicity, appeared to have averted this move.

But, despite a tireless campaign by his parents, he was not returned to Scotland, and, they had to sell their home, and company, to live near him.

Tianze,is 18 next month, and despite a home care package, and promise of a return to the love of his family, another, adult hospital has been recommended.

http://www.fatherspledge.com/free-tianze.php

Leo Andrade-Martinez’s 17 year old son, was placed in St Andrews.

And, it took a very public, and political campaign, to move him to another more suitable hospital

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/jo-worgan-/autism-and-parenting_b_5547357.html

What local provision, would be needed, for the learning disabled, self- harming, common dementia, the autistic, or, those suffering the after effects of a recent brain injury?

And how much of this behaviour is actually caused by the medication the patients are put on ?

Autism, is not a mental illness, but at most a development difference, yet it has recently be placed with learning disability in the Mental Health Act.

What these people need and would cost far less is a local NHS short stay, medication, if necessary, and then to be returned home to their family, where they can be individually monitored by, an independent of, a recycled profit making cabal?

Since when, did a learning disability/autistism/head injury, allow sectioning, under the MHA, or, incapacity encagement for life under the MCA ?

And warrant, the building of Europe’s largest, 16-18 year old residential unit ?

http://www.standrewshealthcare.co.uk/our-services

Since, it was realised, huge, stable, unaccountable profit from public funds, could be made by the mental health industry.

It costs the NHS at least £5,000 per week often much more per patient, for St Andrews commissioned care, which from CQR. and inspections is understaffed.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/08/25/how-many-deaths-in-st-andrews-northampton-who-is-accountable/

Here is a you tube video of a young autistic man sent from Spectrum to St Andrews, he describes the very painful restraints and encagement he suffered.

The National Audit Office produced a report, 4 years after the Winterbourne abuse was revealed by uncover media.

It reports,

‘The scale of the problem remains unchanged. According to the HSCIC census, there were 3,230 hospital in-patients with learning disabilities, autism and or challenging behaviour on 30 September 2014, with an average length of stay of 547 days and living an average 34.4km from home. In 2013, equivalent figures were 3,250 in-patients (though this may have been an underestimate), 542 days and 34.5km.

http://www.theguardian.com/social-care-network/2015/jan/29/winterbourne-view-two-years-on-report?CMP=share_btn_tw

Doctors take an oath, ‘to do no harm’.

Yet, those ‘treating’ patients in St Andrews, use largely unproven, unnecessary medication.

Producing, apparently, little other than sedation and greatly worsening the patients mental and physical condition and quality of life..

Side effects of medication, can cause great harm, and,result in mental illness, and even death.

The physical health of the patients is not monitored, other than a routine by nurse health check, which, if any resistance is shown, is tick boxed refused.

Even were deaths on similar medication, and symptoms on the same ward occur , these are not even discussed, or prevention taken to avoid further deaths.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/08/19/deaths-at-st-andrews-mental-hospital-Northampton/

Long term patients, will be subject to similar health concerns, as if, they were not mentally disabled.

And, are in a far more vulnerable position, because, they cannot describe their symptoms, and, the effects of their medication.

The anguish of pain, is indistinguishable from mental disturbance.

And, often made impossible by medication.

They will be given no pain killers, and may spend years in excruciating pain.

As my daughter did, with poo up to her chest internally, treated with Risperidol.

How must those in St Andrew’s, who died in similar circumstances have suffered?

Such vulnerable patients, need extra vigilant ,medical attention, not nursing oversight, easily refused.

That is why last year a staggering 1400 learning disabled died last year, probably more this year.

Mencap dismayed by lack of progress to stop avoidable deaths of people with a learning disability

That is 3 a day.

And, at least £7,000 and up to £13,000 per week, is paid for their care, the NHS is certainly paying for it.guilty_jpg312_910284464x220

Dr Paul Lelliott, CQC’s Deputy Chief Inspector of Hospitals (lead for mental health), said:
“Overall we rated St Andrew’s Healthcare as Requires Improvement.
“Many of the children and young people admitted to St Andrew’s Healthcare have severe mental health problems and have a history of behaviour that has put themselves or others at risk. Despite that, we were surprised at the number of occasions when staff had resorted to physical restraint. The staff at St Andrew’s Healthcare must ensure that when restraint is used it is by the safest means to minimise the possibility of harm to the patient.
“St Andrew’s Healthcare has had difficulty recruiting nursing staff and many posts were vacant. It has been relying heavily on the on the use of agency and bank nurses “The service has given us assurances that it is making the necessary improvements and we have already witnessed some of these in action.
“People deserve to be treated in services which are safe, caring, effective, well-led, and responsive to their needs and this is what we look at when we carry out our inspections. We will continue to monitor this service closely and this will include further inspections.”

Deaths at St. Andrews Hospital, Northampton

St Andrews Hospital, Northampton.

An inquest into the death of 41 year old William Johnson, who had lived in St Andrews for 18 years, heard 3 other men on his ward had predeceased him, exhibiting  similar symptoms and on the similar medication.

The first death was on October 23rd 2010, second March 31st 2011, third April 3rd 2011 and then, Mr Johnson on May 31st 2011.

4 deaths, half the 8 bedded ward, in just 8 months.

This ward was costing the tax payer at least £ 96,000 per week tax free of NHS public money.

A staggering 120,000 a week, as untaxed, for an 8 bed ward, where half the patients died in 8 months with same deaths and nothing done.

Yet despite this being NHS OUR money nothing has been done

And this is allowed to be MHA treament,

why did William die? For his care costing then over £10,000, A WEEK.

A Coroner, delivered a narrative verdict .

And he refused to reopen the inquest.

The only other inquest into the previous deaths had recorded death by ‘natural causes’.

http://www.northamptonchron.co.uk/news/health/health-news/appeal-for-st-andrew-hospital-deaths-report-to-be-public-1-6008003

Narrative verdicts were created in 2004, and merely describe the circumstances of a death not how it was caused.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narrative_verdict

Dr Adewale Aromolaran, the senior doctor, in charge of the ward, when Mr Johnson died told the inquest,

He was not involved ‘in any discussions about the three previous deaths’,

Despite Mr Johnson’s similar medication and similar  physical symptoms.

Yet ‘Parallels’ between the deaths were noted by the inquest.

However, Dr Aromolaram was made aware, of the second, and, third deaths, on his becoming a member of the ward ‘team’.

But despite the quick succession of deaths, the last 2 men to die before Mr Johnson, dying within four days of each other, and Mr Johnson, ‘ vomiting large amounts of body salts.’

As his organs, slowly, filled up with a faeces impaction, a common condition in the autistic per se and a side effect of the high dosages of at least two different antipsychotics.

The doctor alarmingly, gave evidence at the inquest that;

“There were no discussions. No talks at all about those deaths that I was involved in”.

All men were medicated with clozaphine which is known to cause constipation.

Click to access serioius-gastrointestinal-adverse-effects-of-clozapine.pdf

So, the managing doctor, of an 8 bedded ward where 3 deaths had already occurred in only 7 months before he became part of the ward management team was not informed of the first death, nor discussed the similarities of the second and third.

Nor, even, more crucially, did the doctor connect this latest death with the  two deaths, less than 2 months before William Johnson, who like William would have been presumably also ‘vomiting up large amounts of body salts’.

And, worse stilldespite a 3rd death, the hospital appeared to have taken no precautions, to find out the reasons, nor change the treatment of the others in the ward.

The medication was continued in the same high dosage to people incapacitated, throwing up  permanently in bed.

 How can this be treatment under MHA section-  ? And interminable except on death of patient ?

And why did no one check on the physical health of these successively dying men as they were obviously seriously ill, throwing up and no doubt in constant agony.

 

The doctor gave evidence, that it had been impossible even to ‘try’ to examine Mr Johnson’s abdomen during a ‘routine’ health check as he would not let the examination proceed.

How likely is it that a man, bed ridden full of chemical coshes, vomiting up salt, would/ could/should  have not allowed a hand on his bowel area easily able to pick up such a serious impaction, which should in any event, should have been picked up from vomiting salt, the side effects of medication and three previous deaths in similar circumstances in less than 8 months ?

And if continual medication can be enforced why not a life saving examination ?

Did no one ask why all these men were vomiting up body salts ?

And, in any event, would such a ‘routine’ health check have checked for and detected an impaction. ?

And, why, was only a ‘routine’ health check, thought sufficient, when this man was obviously dying, in the same manner, in the same ward, as his 3 fellow ward occupants, in quick succession ?.

How many ‘routine’ health checks, are tick boxed refused, and, who actually performs them ?

On this basic safety/ care issue, staggeringly, Dr Aromolaram, was not aware  of any hospital strategy in place, if a health check was refused.

St Andrews glossy PR is on the internet http://www.standrewshealthcare.co.uk/sites/default/files/documents/12136_SAH_Quality%20Accounts%20A4%2044pp_V13%20(final_reduced%20size).pdf

The tax payer, was, paying at least £9,000 per week for this ‘treatment’, when charitable tax exemption is factored in.

We do not know the figures that is charged and paid for with our public money.

The Priory and Cygnet charge a minimum of £900 per night and up to £12,500 a week for an autistic 15 year old in an acute mental health bed.

See the structure of the provision and ward system here:

Click to access St%20%20Andrew’s%20Accounts%20for%202013%20to%202014%20(reduced%20size%20for%20web).pdf

St Andrews, had a turnover of £187.5million in 2013/14.

And, its chief executive at the time was earning £675,000 per annum.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/08/01/st-andrews-healthcares-recycled-income/

The service was private, and commissioned and paid for by NHS England.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/07/14/mca-incapables-perfect-pharma-and-research-cashcows-with-few-safeguards/

3 learning disabled, a day, died of inadequate NHS care, last year- that’s a staggering 1200, and, it was probably more this year.

Mencap dismayed by lack of progress to stop avoidable deaths of people with a learning disability

And, billions of profit has been made from their care.

Care Quality Commission Report 2014 see summary – Requires Improvement.

See summary. http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/1-102643363_coreservice_child_and_adolescent_mental_health_services_st_andrew_s_healthcare_scheduled_20150107%20%281%29.pdf

Since the deaths St Andrews have been forced to acknowledge the role medication might play

http://modernasylum.com/deaths-at-st-andrews/

‘Raze out the written troubles of the brain’. The Myth and Horror of Mental Disease

Mquote-canst-thou-not-minster-to-a-mind-diseased-pluck-from-the-memory-a-rooted-sorrow-raze-out-the-william-shakespeare-384568

Psychiatry, is defined, as.

the diagnosis and treatment of mental diseases’.

‘Disease’ as a concept can only be defined in terms of its pathology.

Pathology  diagnoses disease from changes in cells, tissues, and body fluids.

Not even Schizophrenia, or psychosis, let alone, the recently created 375 mental ‘disorders’ have any pathology and therefore cannot be ‘diseases’.

And psychiatrists have had to admit  to this.

The difference between a medical diagnosis and a psychiatric diagnosis

Many academic and influential psychiatrists have written extensively on the non existence of mental illness per se, in books like ‘The Myth of Mental Illness’ by Thomas Szasz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Szasz

Once a putative disease,  that has a pathology like neurosyphilis, is diagnosed, it then becomes a physical not a mental disease.

The use today, of socially ‘acceptable’ conduct/behaviour, as the main  diagnosis of  mental ‘diseases’, is akin to its historic use, that categorised homosexuality as a disease of the brain.

And institutionalised unmarried mothers as social deviants.

It would appear, social control, and profit, are the reason for our third largest, burgeoning pharma industry, and mental health services, soon to be totally privatised. https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/12/16/mental-health-big-pharma-big-profits-big-danger/

It  is now possible, to label almost anything, as  a mental ‘disease’/disorder,- alcoholism, shyness, terrible twos, removing social responsibility, maintaining social control, and make profit from these new diseases, by fixing them with expensive, dangerous magic bullets, that cause more harm, than good

.http://www.cchrint.org/2011/07/29/harvard-expert-ties-mental-illness-epidemic-to-big-pharmas-agenda/

And, the side effects of this ‘disease cure’, itself, then causes pathological changes  in brain and body and even death.

We are insidiously brainwashed by TV soap operas, like Coronation St to believe, that these ‘diseases’, like depression/ADHD  are common, and can be miraculously cured by drugs.

Such medication, at best turn us into human robots, unable to emphasise or feel, or, at worst, has side effects, that will then be treated, with more dangerous magic bullets.

Rarely, are they the solution, except for a very short time preferably with counselling.

And their use, boosting the pharma industry, and our economy,  motivated, by unregulated profit.

The following blog comments, received from two mothers are just two of the millions affected.

Theirs, and their child’s horror, speaks for itself.

Pauline Thomas writes of her son’s medication

‘My son has been taking Carbamazepine for 25 years, and Lamotrogine for 19 years.

Both are anticonvulsants. Both also used has mood enhancers for people suffering with Bi-Polar My son has cerebral palsy, mostly down his left side and a learning disability.

My son was 17 when he was diagnosed with epilepsy after a hip operation. He was medicated on Carbamazapine, and for 5 years was seizure free.

We were coming to the decision to start taking them away, when he started having startle jumps whenever there was a loud noise or someone knocked against him. Sometimes these jumps led into a full blown seizure (tonic clonic).

It was then that he was medicated with Lamotrigine. Six months later he was getting moody and distressed. We did not realize then that Lamotrigine effected peoples moods. We were given help from psychologists.

In 2008 his seizures stopped. About the same time he was having aggressive outbursts and refusing to do anything or go anywhere. Sometimes they lasted for a few days, sometimes longer. At this time the day services in our borough were being pared down and outsourced to private companies. A disaster for him and many others.

Anyway in late 2012 we started to reduce his carbamazepine (he was on 1000mg daily).

Carbamazepine is an enzyme inducer. Any drug taken with Carbamazepine (Lamotrigine) would automatically begin to get stronger when you start to reduce CBZ.

I reminded the psychiatrist of this but he ignored me. Perhaps he thought I was talking out of turn?

The result was that a month after he was free of CBZ (in Jan 2014) he started to have terrible frightening hallucinations. He was terrified. He could not sleep. He was so scared.

We contacted his psychiatrist who said that he had never come across this type of reaction before but he believed my son was having a interictal reaction to his withdrawal of CBZ. I argued that he was most probably having a toxic reaction to Lamotrigine. His psychiatrist reinstated 400mg of carbamazepine.in two weeks. He recoverd for 3 weeks and then went back to be psychotic again but this time with the added side effect of ‘freeezing’ in the middle of doing anything. He would suddenly stop like a statue.

Telemetry showed no sign of any seizure activity. We have now began the long haul of getting rid all his medication. Lamotrigine is gone. We are now down to 400mg of CBZ.

The withdrawl symptoms are horrendous. Completely in a world of his own. Keeps talking about his days st college (20 years ago) with a focus on the same person. Her name and her parents and her sister going over and over in his head. It is like living with a completely different person

Carbamazepine has wrecked my son’s bones. He has osteoporosis. He has reduced white blood cells. (leucopenia). Both known side effects. He has little purple mauve spots on his body. Another known side effect which has been ignored by his psychiatrist. His psychiatrist suggested a while ago that my son should take biphosphonates to strengthen his bones. We refused, as we said we would not know if the drug would harm him, or if he was experiencing any side effects.

In America the drug company Merck was being sued by patients suffering with necrosis of the jaw and cancer of the oesophagus  after being on this drug.

We were threatened with the MCA

The doctor said if it could be proved that my son lacked capacity it could be taken out of our hands. This is why we cannot trust or like this doctor.

The doctor claims that my son is not suffering from withdrawal symptoms because antiepileptics have no known withdrawal symptoms.

He has reminded us however that they are mood enhancers.

We reminded him that our son was not mentally ill when he was given antiepileptic drugs.

My research tells me that Carbamazapine is related to the tricyclic group of drugs, which are antidepressants. There are withdrawal symptoms with antidepressants, especially if you have been on them for many years.

I recently purchased a book by American Dr. Peter Breggin called Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal, and one of his arguments is that

prescribers identify drugs according to the conditions that they are being used to treat rather than by their pharmacological category or characteristics, including their impact on the brain.

He also in his book refers to articles by Dr. Joanna Moncrieff.

I deplore that many of our children and loved ones are being used by the pharma and psychiatrist world as some sort of learning curve.

My son and many like him cannot fully explain what side effects they are having. Thank you Finola for exposing these cruel practices… ‘.

Another Mother, Cynthia Bartlett, wrote tragically of her son Charlie;.

‘ My son, Charlie, died two years ago of what I believe to be side effects from Risperdal given from age 15 until a few months before his death ay age 24.

I am really trying to start and do an investigative journalism piece on just this…Risperdal is routinely handed out here in Canada to children with autism.

I see one boy (on risperdal since age eight) in our small town, going down, exactly as my son did, starting with a strange gait and then rapid onset dystonia, losing swallowing and then dying from choking in the middle of the night.

I have accompanied the family to the neurologist to no avail’.

Our government, is at present debating, and, determined to introduce, an Assisted Suicide Act, legalising euthanasia.

One of  its clauses, could be, that if, all the MCA ‘incapable’, would have decided, to end their life, were they capable, the state can end it, for them.

Even, their body parts, can be used under MCA regulations.

This will mean no inquests, into why they died, even court deracinated family, need not be told of their death.

Parents of the MCA disappeared are not even afforded notification and a funeral.

There is no closure on parents’ lifetime horror of wondering what is happening or has happened to their child.

Today, literally by now thousands  of autistics and LD  are holed up in private NHS ‘hospitals’ and private care homes like Winterbourne View some managing to survive for decades.

All a statistic earning £4,500, for 24/7 surveillance, and medication.

What physical and mental state will they be in by now?

Imagine, the permanent effects of the long term drugs, they have been pumped full of, the horror is too much to contemplate but they and their families must daily.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/01/01/the-risperidone-scandal/

There are no future services/ life, for autistics, and, mentally disordered, except, as such encaged, cash cows.

The corporate/charity ‘independent’ living providers, need drugs, to enforce their ‘support’, as the system, does not allow, for individual care.

Shakespeare knew over 400 years ago no doctor could,

Raze out the written troubles of the brain.

As, Therein the patient Must minister to himself.’

And the autistic and learning disabled are not mentally ill.

But, these wise words were before big pharma and the realisation of the gold mine of mental disability.

Scientology_psychiatry_kills

Harvesting of the Disabled for Profit

A2013-09-20-15_36_14Parents of special educational needs children including those labelled autistic be warned this may be your fate.

The state are creating and labelling children as having a learning disability rather than a difficulty.

The renamed label is intellectual disability

See the latest number here.

http://schoolsweek.co.uk/schools-struggle-as-autism-diagnoses-rise-25-per-cent/

There are several databases used to share information illegally under Data Protection Act and s8 HRA to harvest children including future criminals.

http://databasemasterclass.blogspot.co.uk/

A learning (intellectual) ‘disability‘ is an impairment of mind, permanent, innate and evidenced by a low IQ  and is now  on the rise in the UK look at the statistics

http://chrishatton.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/the-disappeared.html?spref=tw.

Whereas a learning ‘difficulty‘ is not inate, and  can be because  a child is autistic ( learns differently), a late developer,  has poor teaching/assessment or taught in a second language,  such a child will have at least an average IQ. .

So if your child is a late developer autistic, has inadequate teaching he labelled and doomed to be a cash cow for life.

Unless he is part of the labelling state cabal.

Or in private education as they do not have the EHC system.

Education, Health, and Care Statements replaced Special Educational Needs statements last year.

Education, Health and Care statements unlike SEN, require social services to monitor your child’s ‘welfare’.

A school protection officer/ social worker will now be part of your life.

And,  your  child’s name secretly notified to  MASH- Multi Agency, Safeguarding Hub

Invasive IT Databases are being provided by CAPITA at 2016 see link.

In breach of HRA and Data Protection, to target families at risk in schools without their permission or even knowledge.

Click to access capita_one_-_product_brochure_-_one_analytics_-_apr16.pdf

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/working-together-to-safeguard-children-multi-agency-safeguarding-hubs

Your child will be in this system and by it watched covertly by every  agent of the state.

Read here the law and databases used to target the ‘disabled’ and their families by all agents of the state.

http://databasemasterclass.blogspot.co.uk/

And, despite the inherent difficulties of coping with an autistic./ different child.

Any bruise, scratch, dirt, swear  word, behaviour issue, sexualised behaviour, weight loss/gain,  head lice, old /inappropriate/clothing, emotional problem, parents relationship, lateness, rearrangement of meeting, attitude,comments, will be noted.

But you will be unaware you are under their microscope.

And have no right of reply or correction of their databases.

You will be impressed everyone  is taking such an interest.

Ignorant of why, your child really is, so ‘special’.

In June 2016 the government announced millions would be given to provide early intervention before crisis point.

This means those merely ‘at risk’ will also be targeted ie the poor, or those with relatives with special needs.

Education ‘pathways‘ are  used to harvest as many as possible to private eventually venture capital education and care .

As it is highly profitable- £200,000 a year financed by NHS (health), LA ( social),  D of E ( education )

.http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/acorn-care-acquires-pathway-care-9102370

All areas have similar Pathways as shown here for Nottingham

http://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/DMS/Document.ashx?czJKcaeAi5tUFL1DTL2UE4zNRBcoShgo=bSSB5VpG8vooSzX00hg%2FyPEcYUVxHpzqPrPXMJfEF%2BxGVODFeCYDfw%3D%3D&rUzwRPf%2BZ3zd4E7Ikn8Lyw%3D%3D=pwRE6AGJFLDNlh225F5QMaQWCtPHwdhUfCZ%2FLUQzgA2uL5jNRG4jdQ%3D%3D&mCTIbCubSFfXsDGW9IXnlg%3D%3D=hFflUdN3100%3D&kCx1AnS9%2FpWZQ40DXFvdEw%3D%3D=hFflUdN3100%3D&uJovDxwdjMPoYv%2BAJvYtyA%3D%3D=ctNJFf55vVA%3D&FgPlIEJYlotS%2BYGoBi5olA%3D%3D=NHdURQburHA%3D&d9Qjj0ag1Pd993jsyOJqFvmyB7X0CSQK=ctNJFf55vVA%3D&WGewmoAfeNR9xqBux0r1Q8Za60lavYmz=ctNJFf55vVA%3D&WGewmoAfeNQ16B2MHuCpMRKZMwaG1PaO=ctNJFf55vVA%3D

This intelligence gathering can be used to enforce any medication, therapy, schooling, or silence your complaints, via care proceeding or threat of them.

And serves as a file of historic ‘concerns’ of parental abuse/neglect/capacity, and/or future, Court of Protection LA evidence, that it is in your 18+ child’s ‘best interests’ to  be removed to community living for life, and your access limited and/or excluded.

Under EHC statements, your child can no longer attend a day school at 16, nor use overnight respite facilities.

His education, continues, by ad hoc, unaccountable, ‘independent’ living skills education packages

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/11/25/education-health-and-care-statements-emperors-clothes/

Consisting of agency workers,  escorting him to ad hoc skills facilities, overseen by a package boss.

Who, unknown to you are briefed on ‘your family’s file’ and will continue to monitor your child’s ‘welfare’.

Their goal,  is ‘independent’, away from home living and  is likely, to result, in a cash bonus, or, at least, more lucrative education packages from the LA.

‘Education’ will discuss leaving Mummy and Daddy, with your child.

Regardless of the effect or yours or his wishes.

And, you may not be told.

At 18, all services are funded by Adult Services.

Due to government cuts, these services are limited to assessment for state residential care for life- independent/ supported/community living,

A new private industry being bought up by monopoly venture capital US companies like Cygnet who own CAMBIAN with over 160 home sites.

http://www.local.gov.uk/documents/10180/5854661/Adult+social+care+funding+2014+state+of+the+nation+report/e32866fa-d512-4e77-9961-8861d2d93238.

This states,

‘The MODEL OF CARE, is increasingly one, which promotes INDEPENDENCE, and MANAGERS RISK.’ ( Code for ‘community’/supported living). 

Pressure, will be placed on the LA, to transfer adult funding to central government funding, which is only available, for residential Provision.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/04/27/independent-living-disabled-penned-for-profit/

The LA’s standard  adult support plan criteria eludes to this in a question the Adult Social Worker must complete;

Does the plan promote independence including identifying goals that could result in reducing paid support within an agreed period ?

Your child because of his learning difficulty will be treated as a ‘child in need’ under s17 Childrens  Act.

Children in need meetings will be held  with the education package, and, safeguarding issues  raised,- hygiene, clothing, food, parenting, medical and dental attendance, physical, sexual emotional  abuse,  and, placed in social services core assessments.

As, the LA funding can only decide, it is in your child’s ‘best interests’, to live away from you, and, your access limited, little in your favour, will be recorded.

No matter, how unfairly skewed against you, even if factually incorrect, it appears impossible, to change these assessments, and, relay  the correct information to professionals, and agencies.

The difficultly posed by your child’s disability, or, the inadequacy of support will not be considered.

The LA commission the services, and, it is liable, if inadequate.

Your ability to safeguard, parent, clean your home, and not neglect your child, will be judged, as if your child, were not disabled.

And, any possible concerns, re cleanliness/safeguarding/emotional abuse, real, or contrived,

Will be reported back, by support workers.

Whilst, your child’s disability, will not be considered, in assessing your parental capacity.

It will be, grossly exaggerated, by the LA in  their assessments of him,

To enable the maximum to be claimed from public funds to be paid to private  independent/community living providers.

The worse your child’s behave becomes or is made to appear, the greater the income  the independent/supported living provider  can claim.

This also is used as evidence you are unable to cope, and it is  in his ‘best interests’ he to be removed.

If you do get support, it will not be charged to help you, other than engage with your child.

But, support will be charged, to assess your capability, as a parent, and, whether you have a safe, clean, adequate home environment.

But you again, will be unaware of this. https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/10/14/gathering-evidence-from-social-https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/10/14/gathering-evidence-from-social-care/

Regular meeting s behind your back, will be held, between the social services, education, and, agency worker provider, who  have ‘your file’.

Your family, and child, will be whatever, they, in secret, decide.

Any information, you provide to workers/professionals, about your child, that does not fit the cabal’s purpose, of abuse, and neglect, safeguarding concerns will be ignored.

Support workers, on zero hour, minimum wage contracts, will be briefed, on the questions, to ask, and, matters to look out for.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/02/10/i-smell-a-rat/

Your family GP, will also  be part of the canal, and, despite confidentiality restrictions, both, your child’s medical records, and yours, will be shared.

Anything, that points to present or future parental physical, or mental incapacity, will be used to show, it is in your child’s ‘best interests’, to be removed to ‘independent’ living.

Any existent, or non-existent health, or mental concerns will be notified to your GP, by education, or, any agency, or social worker. https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/08/24/my-complaint-and-unaccountable-services/

To possibly gain support, as a carer, or, any respite, cleaning   etc, you will have to undergo a Carer’s assessment.

This is used to probe, every aspect of your physical and mental ‘wellbeing’.

But, the LA are not under a duty, to provide support, and, have no funds to do so.

And, will only consider it, if the affect on a carer’s wellbeing, is ‘severe’, which would then make a carer, unfit, and/or a risk to their chargee. https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/11/20/carers-act-2014-care-to-ensnare/

‘Concerns’, from support/education workers, are relayed to social services.

And sought expressly, by leading questioning.

And covertly, by tricks and grooming.

You will consider them all your friends, until without notice they disappear.

They will not raise their concerns with you.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/01/31/education-report-a-red-mark-the-size-of-a-fist/

These ‘concerns’, will be placed in court statements,to prevent you representing your child in court as you are cast as abuser/neglector there is a conflict of interests between you and your child.,

And, show, it is in his ‘best interests’, to be removed from you and your contact limited.

You will only discover, their ‘concerns’, on reading your social worker’s  court statement, in support of s48 Mental Capacity Act Interim application to the Court of Protection.

Your child will be forced, if necessary, by a court order, to undergo a psychological assessment, paid for by the LA.

This will assess, any deemed emotional abuse your child is subjected to at home, and a blanket, illegal capacity test.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/03/03/standard-capacity-assessments-stephen-hawking-would-fail-without-his-box/

This will state, that due to your child’s ‘intellectual disability’, he is, and has always been, unable to make any decisions.

It is now assumed that children subject to a SEN now EHC statement will be incapable under MCA and conferences for SEN families give presentations to that effect on Transition ie 16-18, see here

Click to access Transition%20seminar%20FINAL%20(2).pdf

Your child has now been made, the perfect commodity for life, for the multibillion pound, unaccountable, independent living industry.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/05/31/the-mental-capacity-act-in-practice-emancipated-or-insentient/

Where he is safely behind the closed doors of the state where abuse  or even death is not investigated.

Your GP, will  look for signs of neglect, weight loss, bed sores, skin conditions, abuse, and self -harm.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/09/25/a-voice-crying-in-the-wilderness/

If you proffer other causes, this may be evidence of fabricated disorder/ Munchausen.

Your GP, will be instructed by the Court of Protection, to do a  physical examination of your child, under s49 MCA, whether necessary, or not, and, any other assessments.

And, regardless of the distress, it causes.

His letter of instruction, will state, that the LA have concerns, and, that you have denied access, to your child, weather proved, or not.

Once the Court, becomes involved, any support workers, will become overt assessors.

All care agencies, and day centres, are funded by the LA, and therefore, controlled by them.

And as, ‘independent’ away from home living, is now the LA’s, only policy, for adult social care, all feed into it.

Despite, his EU, United Nations Rights not, to have the state remove his right to make decisions,http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=279

Here is an OFSTED report in 2016 showing the shambles SEN is in there.

Click to access Joint_local_area_SEND_inspection_in_Surrey.pdf

You, and your child are flies in a sealed LA web.

The government’s Transforming Care document proposes early intervention for the autistic and learning disabled who evidence ‘challenging behaviour  and contains the following statistics;.

There are an estimated 1.2 million people in England, of which 286,000 are children and young people under the age of 18, with a learning disability (Emerson et al. 2012).

This means that roughly 20 people in every thousand have a learning disability (2-3% of the general population). The majority live their lives without support from specialist learning disability services – for instance, of the roughly 1 million adults with a learning disability, it is estimated that 189,000 (21%) (Emerson et al. 2012) are known to learning disability services.

There are an estimated 700,000 people with autism in England (Brugha et al. 2012) of which 125,000 are children and young people under the age of 18 (Baird et al. 2006).

This means that roughly 11 people in every thousand have autism (1.1% of the general population). It is estimated that 44%-52% of people with autism also have a learning disability (Emerson et al. 2010).

Those who display behaviour that challenges Challenging behaviours are generally understood to be exhibited by 10-15% of adults with learning disabilities known to services (approx. 22-34,000 people), whilst often peaking between the ages of 20-49 (Emerson et al. 2001).

A further 40,000 of children under the age of 18 are believed to display challenging behaviour (Emerson et al 2014).

As set out in Challenging Behaviour: A Unified Approach (Royal College of Psychiatrists, et al, 2007, p.14) challenging behaviour is behaviour

of such an intensity, frequency or duration as to threaten the quality of life and/or the physical safety of the individual or others and is likely to lead to responses that are restrictive, aversive or result in exclusion”.

Determined to harvest your child.spider-net-g8i1

The Mental Capacity Act in practice -emancipated or insentient?

feguard

untitled

8 years ago, the Mental Capacity Act was, supposedly implemented to provide a  ’ legal’ framework, to empower, and emancipate,   the incapables’ ‘decision making’.

But has it?

No. See House of Lords Select Committee report.

The Local Authority strategy, to remove all suspected ‘incapables’ to private for profit state care, increased rapidly, after 2007.

Studies show, these removals   were at first,  often illegal, without reference to the Court  of Protection. http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2012/10/30/where-social-workers-are-going-wrong-on-the-mental-capacity-act/

Whereas, now the Court rubber stamps  removal.

As analysed in previous posts, it is functionally, very difficult, to legally comply with s1 of the Act, and, empower the vulnerable.

And this has not happened, as the Act is being used to remove all decisions from the vulnerable and their parents.

From this, we can only  conclude, the real reason for the Act,  was to enforce  private profit institutional  ‘care’ for life away from family and effectively any real community.

Such care, would have huge benefits, for  the government, and LAs.

The LA, gets the old, disabled, and vulnerable off their books, eradicating the need for adult care.

Social workers, are used as enforcers, and then, replaced by care managers, who merely oversee private provision they have commissioned and would be liable for if inadequate.

LA budgets, do not then, have to be used on continuing   home support.

Private profit care, benefits the government,   as,  public money,  available, to the disabled and their families, under the Chronically Sick and Disabled Act 1970, can instead be used by venture capitalists, and businesses, to make profit, from social care,  fuelling  economic growth.

LA budget cuts, purporting to reduce the UK deficit, actually increase it, by payment of huge sums to private care providers .

The market for such care, is  ever extended, now to those which learning disabilities, and behavioural problems, to maximise the potential consumer base.

Capacity/ability to make a decision is assessed routinely, and covertly.

The Care Act 2014, implemented last month, dilutes ‘capacity’, to ’substantial difficulty’ in being involved in decisions.

As   assessments   are   routine, they are  based on age, or label, and  therefore MCA illegal, but who, or, how, could anyone complain?

This approach is highly discriminatory, and, marginalises, and stigmatises   certain groups of people, by questioning their ‘decisions’, and, removing their right to make them.

The state can then enforce any care, and medication, they want.

For those living in residential care, rather than for emancipation, the MCA  is being used, to justify tick- boxed regulation, and unchecked, perfunctory at best, standards of ‘care’, and, defend practioners.

The Supreme Court   decision Cheshire West   [2014] UKSC 19, graphically illustrated, how functionally unworkable the   MCA is, in relation to the many deprivation of liberties, that take place daily, in private care.

And caused   a bureaucratic nightmare, which will do nothing to empower the vulnerable, but simply increases the box ticking of already overburdened, understaffed, underpaid care workers.

It has been translated operationally, to a Review of the Care Provision annually of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards with a Relevant Registered Person, who is generally not a family member but similar to an IMCA trained and appointed by a charity, but paid for by the state and the Adult Services. Most Care Providers have computer software to deal with the matter as part of their ‘best interests’ check list.

As,   with deprivation of liberties, any attempt to actually apply the Act, to the myriad of individual daily decisions, in residential care, as is required by the Act, would also be functionally impossible, particularly, in our, all for profit, zero hour care factories.

Usefully, the court practice is to remove a person’s capacity to make all future decisions, despite this being illegal under the MCA.

This assessment, to add weight to it will often be by a psychologist, pursuant to section 48 MCA.

But can be anyone.

And a s48 MCA application is granted to the LA on merely showing they suspect a person incapable.

The standard assessment order will decide, if a person has the capacity to litigate, make decisions as to where he lives, the care he receives, and the contact he has with members of his family

These are not decision specific,   and, other than for LA funding, often, need not be made, so  illegal under the MCA.

As mentioned in the post, ‘Standard Capacity Assessments Stephen Hawing would fail’, the standard LA assessment, is also apparently illegal.

And, does nothing to maximise capacity, other than tick a box on ease, comfort of circumstances, and, appears not to   encourage joint decision making.

We have no figures of how many, if any, pass the capacity test.

If an assessor, were to find a person   capable, he is proving his pay master LA, who suspected incapacity, and, applied to court, wrong.

The standard Record of Assessment,   will also certify, that a person, is unlikely to regain capacity, condemning him, to never, being allowed to make a decision again.

Providing  care providers, with a blanket incapacity assessment for all future decisions, again illegal.

Worse still, capacity, appears to be being equated with sentience.

As shown in Cheshire West judgement.

Where the court of appeal, and minority of the Supreme Court, held that a person can only be deprived of his liberty, if he has the capacity to understand and object to his situation, ie be aware of it.

Even Lady Hale eluded to ‘incapacity’, being equal to unawareness, by her words

An unconscious or sleeping person may not know that he has been locked in a cell, but he has still been deprived of his liberty.

A mentally disordered person who has been kept in a cupboard under the stairs (a not uncommon occurrence in days gone by) may not appreciate that there is any alternative way to live, but he has still been deprived of his liberty’.

Care workers are encouraged to believe, these very vulnerable scared lonely people with communication issues are actually incapable of any awareness or feeling.

As a support worker, horrifyingly  remarked to me ,

‘Would Issy know what was happening, if 5 strangers removed her from home ?’

The state is now allowed by the subversion  of the MCA, to create  the perfect commodities.

And,  the perfect   victims.insentient

 

The Mental Capacity Test- The Fool of Law ?

Rule of Law is the basis of our freedom and democracy.

It is our protection from state exploitation and tyranny.

It provides our laws must be certain.

Our main and most authoritative source of law is an Act of Parliament.

Parliament must therefore ensure Acts are certain.

That means sufficiently well drafted to be implemented without the need for too much discretion and/or subjectivity on behalf of the executive and/or the judiciary.

If  not, the state will be given too much unauthorised ( not sanctioned by Parliament), unpredictable power over an individual.

An Act, historically, commenced with a paragraph describing its ‘sprit and intendment’, known as a Preamble.

The Preamble’s function  was to explain the purpose of an Act to assist interpretation and application.

Preambles are now rare as thought historic and superfluous .

But The Mental Capacity Act commences with 5 overarching principles in the style of a Preamble but drafted as section 1.

Worse still this section is the main substance of the Act and its overriding principle the agreed by Parliament giving of autonomy to an individual so that decisions he was capable of making were not made for him but it is written in the style of a preamble.

And then the Act dangerously in breach of the rule of law gives no  further specific provisions enacting the main purpose of the Act in s1 principles.

But instead places complete reliance on a lengthy  Code of Practice.

This is poor drafting as it leaves the Act vague and therefore ripe for executive bureaucratic discretion and gives too much unfetted power over the individual.

From a general s.1 embedding autonomy and making a capacity assessment a last resort.

The Act  says no more on these crucial matters other than in the Code of Conduct.

Leaving the purpose of the Act and how it should be implemented to a Code of Conduct.

The  effect of this  is, there no law to  implement the purposes Act in s1.

Instead, s 2 and 3, move straight to define what a person has to prove, to avoid having their ‘capacity’ removed.

By anyone’s standards, a strange way to draft an Act promoting autonomy.

Section 2, is stage one of the capacity assessment.

‘Capacity’ is rather unhelpfully defined, in the Code of Conduct,

as ‘the ability to make a decision’.

Stage one of the capacity test, consists of a finding, that a person has,

an impairment of, or disturbance in, the functioning of the mind, or brain’.

And gives a non-exhaustive, expansive list of examples. mental illness, learning disabled, now 375, including intoxication by alcohol and effect of medication.

But avoids any  definitions/explanations, of these listed classes.

Or the blood sugar, intoxication levels needed to impair or disturb, or indeed, any definition of impairment, or disturbance, or the degree needed to satisfy the test.

This level of vagueness, expansiveness and inherent subjectivity, can only be deliberate..

And, one wonders how anyone, could manage, not to fail  stage one.

Is there any evidence, that anyone has ever passed it?

This means section 3, stage two will almost always be automatically moved on to.

This undefined impairment/disturbance, must be sufficient, to cause the person to be unable to make a particular decision, at the relevant time, when it is needed.

A person is unable to make a decision and therefore, ‘incapable’ if he fails any one of the following;

Firstly, if found that he,

cannot understand information given’.

‘Information given’ is ‘defined’ in the Code of Practice,

‘as information relating to the nature of the decision’.

This leaves the assessor and us to speculate, as to what this ‘information’ might be, and how it is to be imparted to the person who is already suspected of being mentally ‘incapable’.

Consider, for example, the information, that needs to be given to  the suspected ‘incapable’, to make the usual decisions, required in a standard court capacity order;

Which consists of, whether they want to represent themselves in the Court of Protection, where they want to reside, who they want to see, and, whether, they can decide all their own personal welfare decisions.

This  involves the need to impart, a potentially limitless amount of information to the person being assessed capable of making them.

And not only does the assessor need to impart all this information,

S3 (2)   also requires him, to present this information,

in the best way to maximise a person’s capacity’.

So, all this must warrant a vague, impossible, Herculean feat.

But it gets even worse, the poor assessor, is then given, the  even more difficult/impossible task of judging if, a person has  understood all this information.

How can an assessor possibly to this ?

How can he possibly  judge what another person has understood ?

Particularly, if that person has communication difficulties.

If a person says yes, I understand, what it means to act for myself in the court of protection.

Unlikely per se, even if he had already experienced it, and assuming, he had been provided with all the information, relating to the decision, whatever that might be.

Yes, I know all that is involved in looking after my personal welfare, and, have considered, all the information relating to all these decisions, another imponderable.

Will this be sufficient, for an assessor, to be satisfied, a person has indeed, understood, the infinite nuances of such information?

Remember, the assessor, is not allowed by the Act, to make judgements, solely on a person’s behaviour or presentation.

If a person, passes that part of  the test.

How can only be imagined.

The assessor must then decide, that the person is able, to retain, all this mass of information,

long enough to be able to make a decision’.

The Act, does not  stipulate for how long, nor why, this  is specifically made necessary.

As presumably, a person normally indicates his decision, as soon, as he has understood the information, in answer to the question, that requires that decision.

And presumably, the ability to understand this question, by necessity, would need the retention of this information for the required time.

But not only is the assessor charged with assessing the length of ‘memory’ required.

The assessor has to then go on to decide if a person’s   ability,

to use and weigh up the information in making the decision’, is sufficient.

Wow.

This will involve the assessor having the skills, and information, even experts, in the plethora of areas, involved in the decisions, might not possess.

Inter alia, statistics on success of litigants in person, caring for yourself, over being cared for by the state, the psychological effects of seeing certain people, or not, the advantages of a particular residence now, and, in the future.

And, how can an assessor, possibly judge what should be ‘evaluated’, in such decisions.

The assessor himself is unlikely to be able to. Who would?

And, more crucially, whether  the  person with communication difficulties, has ‘evaluated’ them properly?

On what objective criteria, will an assessor’s judgement be based, and, what is to be evaluated?

Such an evaluation, would require an objective evaluation of a sea of information, and unknown future imponderables, and expert knowledge.

But, even more crucially, such evaluation, relies on, and requires, that the person being assessed, has extremely good communication skills, to be able to impart to the assessor, how he evaluated his decision.

How could a person, suspected of mental incapacity, with normally very poor, if any, communication skills, be expected, to explain his evaluation of all this required information?

This must therefore, on analysis, be found to be a farcical, unworkable assessment.

And, grossly unfair on the assessee.

Particularly as in law he is only forced to be assessed because of his disability.

Yet, such assessments, have already removed the autonomy of over a million, with a potential for millions more, for life.

Assessments, that do not even satisfy superficial scrutiny, are removing, our citizens rights to make their own decisions.

Worse still, the Care Act 2014, now weakens the definition of ‘capacity’, to having ‘substantial difficulty’ being involved in specific decisions.

And, this ‘substantial difficulty’ test is the same as the ‘capacity test’ definition in the MCA.

So anyone can assess, and the ‘assessment’, is effectively totally subjective/unworkable.

Terrifying confirmation, that the state is determined, to remove the autonomy of anyone they want to.

Two Acts, provide and dilute, the ultimate weapon of control, and, create a  means to use anyone, as a commodity for private profit.

Has anyone ever passed such a capacity/ ‘substantial difficulty’ test?

comment from internet 2019 below

I had training with a consultant recently which said from a BMI of 13 or less she would never consider them to have capacity ..

.

Click to access GUIDETOMEDICALRISKASSESSMENT.pdf

It-Is-Not-Torture-Small

No one survives a  MCA capacity test

 

Law on Capacity, ‘To Assess or not to assess, that is the question’.

Royal-Mail-Stamps-RSC-HamletThe Mental Capacity Act was, supposedly, passed to empower  the vulnerable, to make their own decisions.

A ‘capacity’ assessment , must therefore,  be a measure of   last resort , as it removes a person’s autonomy in respect to a particular decision.

And, in any event, should only be  undertaken, as and when a decision, ‘needs to be made’.

This is the law as provided by the Act which states

A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision unless all practicable steps to help him to do so have been taken without success

If a person can with help, make a specific decision,he will not be incapable of making it.

And a capacity assessment and removal of that decision from him will be illegal.

so how does fit in with the latest court ruling 2019, of ‘fluctuating    capacity’, being sufficient to remove all decisions from the incapacitated under MCA ?

iT IS ILLEGAL as not authorised by MCA, which states that capacity must be maximised at time of assessment

The Act also provides that prior to an assessment everything  practicable  must be done to enable a person to make the decision himself.

This requires, that the person proposing to assess, knows as much about the assessee as possible, to know how  a person’s capacity can be maximised.

So basic capacity facilitators, such as the assessee’s ease, a familiar environment, no illness, or distress ,should be ensured and the assessor should  not be a stranger.

And, the decision if possible, be made jointly with the suspected incapable, before the dynamic is changed, by a formal capacity assessment, which by its nature removes the incapable from the decision making process.

The Act shows the importance of protecting a person’s autonomy as it is made the first overarching principle of the Act;

‘A person must be assumed to have capacity unless it is established that he lacks capacity’

In addition, the MCA Code of Practice states in para 4.4 provides,

An assessment of a person’s capacity must be based on their ability to make a specific decision at the time it needs to be made, and not their ability to make decisions in general

Yet everyone now breaches this law by declaring people ‘incapable’.

So the first thing to be established is what decision,

Does it appear a person has lost the capacity to make?

And what is the evidence of this?

If a person has all his life, decided, what to eat, where to live, and who to see.

And is still doing this, then, he is not having difficulty making these decisions.

So why then, need his capacity be questioned, in respect to these decisions, as it is now, daily by Local Authorities, particularly, if he has a learning disability, or is autistic ?

The Act also states, there must be evidence of a difficulty making a decision, at the time the decision needs to be made ?

Again, Local Authorities, do not appear to need to explain,  why they have decided a decision ‘needs be made’,  at a particular time, other than to fund services  at 18, and/or, due to exaggerated/non existent safeguarding concerns.

Any presumption of incapacity, before a test, is illegal, and, ipso facto excludes, a person from the decision making process, and prevents the steps  legally needed to maximise capacity.

Without these the test is unfair, illegal..

And the empowering nature of the act subverted.

Its raison d’etra ,thwarted.

Merely because a particular decision is unwise, or other, than one, the assessor would have made, or makes care easier, does not make a person incapable of making it.

And the incapacity, must be directly linked/ connected  to an ‘impairment of mind’.

If a person, has already been making, the same decisions all his life, and, there is no new impairment, for example he is autistic, or learning disabled from birth , then, why would he suddenly, be unable to make these decisions ?

And, how could they be due to an impairment, he had had when he was making them .

If, indeed, autism can be classed as such an  ‘impairment’.

And, it must be remembered, that just because a person is unable, or unwilling, to make a decision,this does not mean, they are not capable of making it.

Hamlet was not incapable.

The reality is, that the mental health system is awash with people, who are assessed as ‘incapable’, for no other reason than they  are labelled with one of the 375 mental disorders now available.

And most do not even engage with their assessment, and their assessment is generally an illegal blanket ‘incapable’ of any decision assessment for life.

Autism Epidemic the betrayal of the ‘different’ for profit.

Einstein_Tongue

What is autism?

The truth is startling.

No one has a clue.

There is no pathology, no gene, no biomarkers and little understanding .

It is an intrinsic part of an individual’s personality.

And as such, many maintain is not an ‘impairment of mind’, under the Mental Capacity Act.

And, it was not until recently  a mental disorder under the Mental Health Act.

It is a spectrum, we are all on.

Like quantum mechanics, it does not exist, until observed and labelled.

Only 70 years ago, it was merely a Greek word, meaning, ‘absorbed in self’.

Associated with loners, high intelligence, gifts, cold mothers, and, the children of academics.

Newton, Mozart and Einstein, who at 7, constantly repeated certain phrases, all showed autistic traits.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/3326317/Albert-Einstein-found-genius-through-autism.html

On reading Plato’s description of Socrates, he could well have been autistic.

A study by University of Sterling this year shows it is associated with creativity

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/aug/22/autism-creative-thinking-study?CMP=share_btn_tw

Yet a ‘lack of imagination’ is one of its main diagnosis criteria.

Read this lady’s account of the genius of her autistic  son.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Spark-Mothers-Nurturing-Genius/dp/0812983564

Scientists have urged it should not be treated as a disability but a different way of thinking with advantages

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2056941/Autism-advantage-Valuable-traits-include-exceptional-memory-visual-skills.html

Here a mute autistic writes how wrong the experts are about him.

https://growingkidstherapy.wordpress.com/2017/01/05/diagnosis-disruption-debunking-the-myths-of-non-verbal-autism/

But today in the western world autistics are made the biggest cash cows .

anhttp://www.lse.ac.uk/newsAndMedia/news/archives/2014/06/Autism.aspxd educate,

They cost the UK more than cancer,or heart disease.

Yet a recent study shows, they are 2.5 more likely to die prematurely in comparison to the rest of the population.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/308160.php

Why, as autism is not a physical illness ?

Is it because the autistic are huge pharma cash cows, earning billions for the autism and pharma industries, yet  receive little or no proper medical treatment.

And as a lucrative commodity the  number of autistic in the UK has increased ten fold, in the last 15 years, and 50% in the last 5 years.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/9160322/Number-of-children-with-autism-soars-by-more-than-50-per-cent-in-five-years.html

In the US, study shows, it will cost one trillon billion dollars by 2025 http://consumer.healthday.com/cognitive-health-information-26/autism-news-51/u-s-autism-costs-could-reach-1-trillion-by-2025-study-701789.

Surveys increase the epidemic.

htmlhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-11-13/autism-rate-nearly-doubles-on-paper-after-a-survey-is-changed

So there is an awful lot of money to be made out of autism.

It is likely, some disorders diagnosed as ‘autism’ is not but reaction/effect of vaccines- compulsory in USA, put under autism’s vague umbrella.

View at Medium.com

Autistics are now assessed,  as intellectually disabled, based unfairly/discriminatory on adeptive skills alone, irrespective of IQ.

And then  taught, medicated, and treated, as if mentally retarded.

This  allows inappropriate ‘special needs’ non- education, drug administration.

And, worse still, autistics being assessed, at 18, as being ‘incapable’ of  the most basic decisions, as to who they have a relationship with or where they live.

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 is being  illegally enforced, allowing the state to declare the autistic,  incapable of making any future or past decision.

Yet, educationally, autism, is a conditioning disability, not a learning one.

Autistics are not intellectually disabled.

Autistic children’s  IQs, have been shown, in recent research by Swansea University, to be underestimated, as IQ tests are designed for non autistic children.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/09/10/profitable-retardation-of-the-autistic/

They merely have a different perception of reality, and therefore think, and  learn differently.

Autism, is explained and defined, as a difficulty with social imagination, communication, and interaction.

A  vague, expansive, meaningless definition.

What is social imagination ?

Autistics, once labelled, are perfunctorily and simplistically stereo typed, with little regard to the individual.

All like routine, all have sensory problems, all do not look you in the eyes, all hate transitions, all do not understand others emotions, and, the most damning  judgement, all are insentient, under the Mental Capacity Act.

And all this is wrong and discriminatory.

The different, are penalised, because they do not behave socially, learn or communicate as they should.

This, and, ever more blunted psychological diagnostic tools, make it, far too easy to label, a person, who merely, has an unknown, educational, communicational, and social ‘difference’ from the norm.

The diagnosis based on adeptive skills and misdiagnosed intellectual disability.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/20/health/research/new-autism-definition-would-exclude-many-study-suggests.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&hp

With such a cash cow, is it any wonder, more autistics are sought.

By awareness campaigns, in their best interests.

The latest is, to harvest autistic girls, on the basis, too few are being diagnosed.

Yet, the proportion of autistic girls, accords with the biology that the X chromosome masks the disorder in a female.

Who is merely a carrier of the ‘autism’ gene.

And a female will need both her X chromosomes to be affected, so an affected X from each parent, to manifest autism.

So is 50% less likely than a male to be autistic.

Mandatory  Universal Autism Screening has been called for.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/309783.php

The ‘at risk’ who might not be autistic are sought, and research into genetic causes and biological processes paid for presumably to market drugs and vaccines but specific genes cannot be found.http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/308185.php

It can now supposedly be detected in babies and now before symptoms appear.

http://www.disabledgo.com/blog/2017/02/autism-detectable-in-brain-long-before-symptoms-appear/#.WKYEtIXXJjo

An autism label has already proved devastating for over a million in the UK.

Who with America, form an epidemic in the western world, but not   in the East, and, autism, is virtually non-existent in the third world.

The, ‘in the know’, late developing eccentrics, with private means, can avoid detection, and labelling, research proper education, and, like the characters in the New York specialist school in the book, ‘Bring in the idiots’, become high flyers, in literature, and technology.

But not, the ever increasing majority, destined, to be cash cows, for the burgeoning autism industry.

Which spans charities, pharmaceutical, educational special needs, NHS, social care, and independent living.

74% are on anti-psychotic drugs, and, imprisoned for life in NHS ‘treatment’ centres, or ‘independent’ away from family living.

http://www.disabledgo.com/blog/2015/09/fears-that-antipsychotic-drugs-being-used-as-chemical-cosh-in-disability-care/?utm_source=DisabledGo+Blog&utm_medium=facebook

Autism is a social conduct development ‘disorder’ at most, and was not within the Mental Health Act until  recently.

It is not a mental illness.

But recent campaigns that autistics’ mental health was being neglected, enabled, autistic conduct to be perfunctorily diagnosed as separate mental disorders.

Even normal reactions of autistics to crowds, noise, muti stimuli has  now been labelled a separate disorder of Pathological Demand Disorder and Petitions supported by NAS have had it recognised in Scottish Parliament.

How can a mere facet of autism be recognised as a separate disorder, when this should have been appreciated as part of ASD and educated, treated cared for already ?

It serves to surreptitiously widens the net of cash cows by more diagnosis and will not improve care.

ASD has only be placed in the MHA fairly recently and is not a mental but a conduct disorder.

Continually government money is spent to show autistic are mental, the latest Cambridge and Coventry University report on their greater risk of suicide and depression January 2017.

https://www.learningdisabilitytoday.co.uk/study-launched-to-understand-why-autistic-people-may-be-more-at-risk-of-mental-health-issues.aspx

This is the worst form of discrimination and misrepresentation of the autistic and allows autism to be a mental disorder and other mental disorders to be added.

Each requiring profitable medication- OCD, psychosis, anxiety, depression, self-harm, OD, ADHD, and increasing the amount that can be claimed for their care.

https://www.autistica.org.uk/research/mental-health/

So they really are a useful, lucrative feed to the mental health industry and pharma.

How did this all happen? Is no one fighting for the autistic ?

In 2007, the National Autistic Society was the 8th largest charity in the UK, rich with government funding, and, 177,000 per annum residential school placements.

But,  was, strangely, precluded by its trust deed, from researching into the causes of autism.

Its campaign for autism rights, embodied in the Autism Act 2009.

Resulted in worthless, Local Authority Guidelines.

Which need expensive, complex, costs risky judicial reviews, by individuals to enforce.

To date I know of none.

So Local Authorities can ignore the Act.

As shown LA’s adult services policy of non-provision of specialist care.

But, the LA, commission, and the NHS pay, independent living providers, like the National Autistic Society, Autism Care UK, on the ‘severity’ of the individual’s disability.

Using the money available for disabled, and  family support, under the Chronically Sick and Disabled Act1970.

But now neither are given an option except private enforced secret care.

The autism industry, and venture capital, profit from creating ‘difference’.

The autistics have lost their lives, and, we have lost our visionaries, and eccentrics.

See here how a definition of autism allows  the state and care workers to decide all your decisions for life even when you are obviously capable and high functioning.

See fate of this 20 year old diagnosed  as autistic at 18, when Dimensions who own independent living support and the LA  got involved in her life. And an LA behavioural psychiatrist who decided she was MCA incapable of deciding, who she had relationships with and where she lived- terrifying stuff, happens nowhere else in the world.

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCOP/2016/4.html

Read here latest book dispelling the myths about Autism by Steve Sliberman, The Legacy of Autism and the Future of Neurodiversity

http://www.npr.org/2016/09/09/493148713/neurotribes-examines-the-history-and-myths-of-the-autism-spectrum

Despite or because of being made cash cows a study revealed they die prematurely

Dr Hirvikoski says that she was “shocked and horrified” at the results.

Her team found that the mean age of death of somebody with autism was 54 – compared with 70 for the general population. For people with autism and a learning disability, life expectancy was a mere 40 years.

 

 

 

 

autism6