A Life without Choice , let alone, ‘Independence’

article-1392892-0C588EA900000578-684_468x286

The Law on Capacity

The Mental Capacity Act 2005, purported to empower.

The Act, presumes, everyone,  is capable of making a particular decision, until, there is evidence, on the balance of probabilities, by a prescribed assessment,  that, they are not.

As a capacity assessment,  removes a person’s fundamental freedom to  choose.

It should only be undertaken, if ‘incapacity’ is suspected.

And, must only be  of  a person’s ability, to  make a specific decision, at the time that decision needs to be made,  in his best interest.

This assessment,  or, suspicion of incapacity, must not be based, on a person’s mental condition and/or presentation.

Further, the Act’s overarching principle provides;

A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision unless all practicable steps to help him to do so have been taken without success’

S1(3), and, see also s3(2) MCA.

This requires, as much as possible , to be done,  to maximise a person’s capacity to make the particular decision.

And, to avoid Article 12 EU illegality, ‘substitute decision making’, a joint decision, should be attempted before capacity is assessed.

Assessments, should take place, in a familiar place, and, be by a familiar person.

With the assesse, in optimum physical, and emotional health.

Unless in an emergency situation.

An assessment , can only, relate to a person’s capacity, at any particular time.

Capacity to make, a decision, can be regained.

The Mental Capacity Act, is the only Act, as far as I am aware, that allows, the state, to remove a person’s autonomy.

Prior to 2007, the High Court had such power, but, only if, necessary, in a person’s best interest, and, it was used, exceptionally.

Decisions of the autistic, and vulnerable, were generally made by them, with the help, and, protection of their family.

The Reality Since 2007

As early as year 9, parents, will be introduced to a person from ‘Transitions’, at their child’s SEN review.

This person’s function, will not be explained, other than,  autistics/ learning disabled,  find ‘transition’ to adulthood difficult, and, they are there to help.

At 16, your child’s full time school, is no longer funded.

Despite SEN ‘Education’ funding continuing until 25.

Instead, independent living, and employability skills are taught, and, a base building provided.

Most children attending a special school, will automatically, be deemed ‘incapable’, of making  decisions, as to their welfare,  and, finances, by social workers, and GPs  .

As these assessments, are neither time, nor decision specific, and, usually based on their  conditions of autism, and/ or, presentation,  they are illegal.

Even if, a formal capacity test, is undertaken, it appears, it need not be completed, as required by the Act, as the standard Local Authority Assessment Form provides;

The assessment should end if the person is unable to progress through the functional test. For example if a person cannot understand the decision they will not be able to retain it, weigh it in the balance or meaningfully communicate a decision’.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/03/03/standard-capacity-assessments-stephen-hawking-would-fail-without-his-box/

All that needs to happen, is a person be asked ,  do  you know why, you need your medication, or, do you know why you need to pay your disability allowance into your own bank account.

And, show no understanding, and, their reaction noted.

So, effectively, once a person has, an’ impairment of mind’, which the Act makes non- exhaustive, and extensive,Unless, they are a good communicators, with knowledge of modern procedures, and medicines, they are doomed.

It must also be considered, how many non- SEN teenagers, would be able to answer  such questions.

As this standard LA test, is neither time, nor decision  specific, needed, and, can only, if abandoned so early, be based on a person’s condition, and/or presentation, it  is illegal under the Act.

Protection of your child’s ‘rights’,will be tick boxed, by the appointment of his own Independent Mental Capacity Advocate.

Whose only function, is to  explain what is happening to him, and his rights.

Quite what these rights are, is unknown, as the incapable, do not appear to have any under the Act, other than, to consultation.

And, your child’s ‘Advocate’, despite his name, cannot take part, in the decision making process.

At 17, you will be consulted about your child’s, away from home for life placement, but, at 18, it is ‘inappropriate’ for you to make decisions for him, and, you have no right to do so.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/07/07/autistic-parents-have-no-rights-and-the-private-corporate-parent-is-unaccountable/

As your child, lacks the capacity, to make his own  decisions, adult social services, will  make them, and, decide what placement is, in his ‘ best interests ‘.

If  you object, to your child living ‘independently’, or, are unhappy with the chosen placement, the LA will make an application to the Court of Protection,  as your child is ‘incapable’ of choosing where he lives.

If you insist he is capable, and wants to live at home,  the court, will declare, your child ‘incapable’ of all decisions, past, present and future,  and, that it is, in his  best interests, to live in whatever placement, the LA provide.

All his future decisions, will then be dictated by his Care Plan.

Even down to how many baths he has, when he takes them, and, how he is cleaned.

Subject to reviews, this will be, for the rest of his life.

This is his ‘independence’, and, empowerment.

The need for a Deprivation of Liberty Order each time a person is locked in his room or supported living facility is not required by the MCA.

So, despite the Magna Carta, Human Rights Act, Equality Act, Disability Discrimination Act and United Nations Convention, millions, now, and in the future, will be encaged without due process.

A Horrifying Abuse Scandal

And, Supported/independent living, is now, the only policy, and support provided by Social Services.

The House of Lords Select Committee on Mental Capacity Act 05  report

Extract from Hansard on no monitoring of substitute decision making by care provision.

98.  There were also concerns that a decision-maker could assume too much power, and sometimes on the basis of questionable legal authority.

Sheffield Safeguarding Adults Board pointed out that

once a person has been deemed to lack capacity to make a decision they become vulnerable to the opinion of the decision-maker and when those decisions are not reflective of their best interests it often leaves them powerless to challenge“.[157]

This was echoed by other witnesses, who expressed concern over the use of the ‘general defence’—the term often used to describe sections 5 and 6 of the Act (Acts in connection with care or treatment and Section 5 Acts: limitations)—which provides protection from liability for carers and others to carry out acts in relation to a person who lacks capacity.

The pre-legislative scrutiny committee foresaw problems with these sections, which were at the time entitled ‘the general authority’.

They worried that it would wrongly give the “impression that the general authority would be assumed by a single individual who would then take all decisions on behalf of an incapacitated individual”.[158]

In response, the Government removed the term ‘general authority’ from the Bill, but concerns have persisted since implementation.

Professor Phil Fennell and Dr Lucy Series described the general defence as providing “tremendous discretionary power” which was “not subject to any routine monitoring”.[159]

Liberty expressed concern about the very wide range of decisions which could be made under these sections, combined with a “worrying lack of oversight”.

And these decisions, are being made on a business efficiency model, in secret, by large private monopoly care/ supported living provision, with no oversight by the courts, only the Adult Services Managers,  employed by the LA, who commissioned the service, and, would therefore, be liable for its inadequacy, so a huge conflict of interests.http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/11/17/severely-disabled-mans-care-plan-is-not-a-deprivation-of-liberty-says-court-of-appeal/

Advertisements

Effect of the Connor Sparrowhawk Verdict and Puplic Accountability.

Audit checklist on a desk, with tick against audit satisfactory

Over the past 30 years, public health and welfare systems, have been honed to perfect unaccountability,   self- preservation, and risk aversion.

The total impossibility of even NHS complaints is illustrated here.   https://www.dropbox.com/s/xn3zf9epstwl9mh/The%20problem%20is%20the%20burden%20of%20proof.doc?dl=0

It has taken nearly three years, and over a million pounds, a public campaign, several published enquiries a coroner’s inquest, and a jury, to show it was negligent to allow an epileptic, autistic inpatient in an assessment centre to lie for hours unattended in  a bath. .

Connor’s family have effectively got no where in the fight for justice for their son and as can be seen her in his Mum’s blog are still waiting at 5th April 2016.

https://mail.google.com/mail/?tab=wm#inbox/153e2c1b7656bf3a

To decide, that allowing, a vulnerable epileptic man, to drown in his bath, was negligent.

And, it was revealed, that only 6 years earlier, another man had drowned mal- nourished in the same bath, in the same NHS adult treatment centre.

The only conclusion, that can be drawn from this, is, the NHS is publically unaccountable.

And, even when it is, the only sanction is a fine, payable, from public funds, and, resultant insolvency.

Following a pointless, expensive public enquiry. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/feb/06/mid-staffs-hospital-scandal-guide

St Andrews Healthcare, and most Adult Treatment Units, are now run for private profit, but, paid out of the NHS public purse, and, as charities, pay no tax.

So no tax, no accountability, no service, and huge profit.

The perfect business model.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/08/01/st-andrews-healthcares-recycled-income/

And, a similar story is true, now of most public services.

The Baby P scandal, illustrated, the lack of accountability, self-protection, and, inadequacy, of the now, effectively privatised child protection services.

What is their accountability, for the thousands of rapes of children over 15 years in Rotherham alone?

Or, the many illegal adoptions, that pocket adopting agencies, a minimum of £28,000 per child.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/07/07/autistic-parents-have-no-rights-and-the-private-corporate-parent-is-unaccountable/

Mental health is now about creating, as profitable a market, as possible.

When did the learning disabled, autistic, epileptic, need to be institutionalised, and, medicated, at huge public expense, for life?

This is a gold mine, from which private equity is, literally, and, metaphorically, making a killing.

See the billions spent on mental health services in the past 5 years in England.

http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Commons/2015-06-11/2174/

Throwing money at a service, without accountability, has shown not to work.

The forced, costly exposure of how Connor died, which, put his parents, through even more, unnecessary, excruciating hell, will justify further NHS privatisation.

And, be used, to move mental health care, to a local level, and utilise, the private Adult Treatment Units, holding units, and supported living, already in place.

Thomas Rawnsley, was the only occupant for a long time, in the ATU, which, effectively killed him.

Within these local provisions, accountability, is even more elusive.

As they are  policed, by the Mental Capacity Act, and, Court of Protection,

So, unlike   Connor’s NHS treatment, are in secret, and, for life.

And, therefore, the risk of abuse, and death, even greater.

As, are the profit making opportunities, for the outsourcers, venture capitalists, and their supporting industry

http://www.nationalhealthexecutive.com/Health-Care-News/mental-capacity-act-allows-draconian-and-secretive-decisions

Stephen Hawking, and the difference between ‘Capacity’ and ‘Competence’

Physicist_Stephen_Hawking_in_Zero_Gravity_NASA

The Mental Capacity Act defines capacity as,

the ability to make a decision’.

Whilst competence is defined as

the ability to do something successfully or efficiently’.

Competence is a far more expansive creature.

It is the ability to execute a decision, after it has been made .

If we run the two together, at most, the definition of capacity, would be,

‘ the ability to make a decision, successfully’.

Not to be indecisive, like Hamlet

But indecisiveness is excluded from incapacity under the Act.

The Act, was not titled, The Mental ‘Competency’ Act.

Despite this  the MCA capacity test requires a person to understand the reasonably foreseeable consequences if he were to actually execute his decision once made.

This requires far more, than the an ‘ability to make a decision’ as  ‘capacity’ is defined by  the Act. As it requires the competence to perform the decision.

This is a person’s competency not his capacity .

Such a distinction may not affect the assessments of delirious patients, or, the alzheimer confused, to consent to medical treatment. .

But, even here, the capacity test allows draconian and dangerous removal of any patient’s autonomy.

And prevents any questioning, of medical diagnoses, and/or treatment.

Were Ashya King, an incapable adult, he, nor, his parents, could, have availed themselves of laser treatment, and, he,  might now, be severely disabled.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3148042/Cancer-patient-Ashya-King-six-parents-arrested-taking-abroad-pioneering-treatment-UK-given-clear.html

The  MCA Code of Practice worrying  provides a  denial of  medical or mental diagnosis to be possible evidence of   incapacity to consent to treatment.

Jack Nicholson, in One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest, would, therefore, be deemed incapable, of consenting to his treatment, because of his denial of his non existent mental disorder.one-flew-over-the-cuckoos-nest-movie-poster

The MCA Code gives little guidance on assessing capacity when considering proactive decisions.

Stephen Hawking ’s capacity to decide to go into space, or out into the community, without his wheelchair..

Or, an autistic adult’s decision to go out into the community alone.

Are decisions both have the capacity to make but not the competency to perform.

If, they were to insist, they did have such capacity, this would be evidence, this would be evidence, they failed to appreciate, the consequences of their decisions, and, were therefore under the functional assessment,incapable.

Although Professor Hawing’s incapacity, could, not be caused by an’ impairment of the mind’, as unlike an autistic, he has a voice box.

As the Act, likes to have its cake, and eat it, it states, reckless decisions, per se, are not evidence of incapacity.

The MCA capacity test is not about capacity, but competence, safeguarding, and control.

And discriminates against the disabled by using, a disabled’s person’s inability to execute a decision, against him by conflating, incapacity with incompetence.

Parliament appears to have modelled, this capacity test, on the test used, to assess a child’s competency to give evidence.

As section 53(1) of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA 1999) povides:

A person, is not competent to give evidence in criminal proceedings, if it appears to the court, that he is not a person, who is able to understand questions put to him as a witness and give answers to them which can be understood [section 53(3)].

Having lectured, this for twenty years, I can attest, it is a minefield of semantics.

Case law, arguing, it is satisfied, if a child can distinguish, between ‘fact and fantasy’ ie they know teletubies are not real.

Santa Claus?

And, a child must appreciate, the importance of telling the truth, and the consequences in court. as opposed to a social occasion.

Truth is truth?

Suffice it to say, the competence of a child, is a vague, subjective exercise, for a judge to assess, on questioning each particular child.

So one can but wonder, why, Parliament, chose, a similar blunt, subjective tool, to potentially remove, anyone’s autonomy for life in most cases.

Could it serve the real purpose of the MCA ?

‘The Million Dollar Kid’

0_jLe33ZKodNIffjIdA Mum twittered last night, her autistic son, is nicked named, ‘the million dollar kid’ for the £12,500 per week; he earns for his ‘Treatment’ Unit owners.

Yes, you read correctly.

How could such a sum be justified?

Obviously, because it needn’t be.

And, where, in that sum, is the incentive for effective treatment?

Payment, of such sums makes a nonsense of cost cutting, austerity, and reduction of our deficit.

Another Mum, excitedly decorating  her autistic son’s bedroom, his care package, months in the making, having finally, allowed him home, for his 18th birthday, and Christmas, and, forever ?

Smashed to pieces, in yet another faceless meeting, when ‘they’ decided, her son, needed an adult hospital, and, not the love, and care of his family.

No doubt, the effect of this news, will justify, even more medication in his £4,500 per week, tax free, hospital placement.

Whilst, he tries to cling, to the memory of the love, peace, and security of the home life, he was ripped from.

On his refusal to be ‘assessed’, two…….. long years ago.

Autism, cannot be ‘assessed’, or ‘treated’.

It can only be lived with.

With the care, and love, only parents, can give.

Many, many, more such Mums, Dads, and, autistic adults, are out there.

Bullied, powerless, destroyed by the state, to make extortionate private profit, from public funds.

If there were a word for it, obscene.

Beyond shame.

The state have created, and, found, the perfect market, their children’s future.

There are no day schools, yet education is funded to 25.

No day centres, respite facilities.

They have been closed.

On the audacity of LA budget cuts, which allow, the same LA, or NHS, to commission £4,500/12,500 per week placements.

Venture capitalist investors, are advised, to move their money out of domiciliary care, as the future is not with the family.

The only Adult Service, is institutional state provision, whatever, laudable name it’s given.

‘Service provider centred’, ‘people centred’, but the ‘centred’, have no rights or choice.

The adult ‘learning disabled’ residential sector, has now out grown the old, and Alzheimer one.

A Care Quality Commission’s role, is now to market watch.

The Local Authorities, most likely, via secret societies, like Common Purpose UK, control the commissions.

Many providers, are subsidiaries of Companies, registered outside the UK, so there is scant financial transparency.

These faceless conglomerates, owe no duty to their vulnerable, voiceless consumers.

Only, to use them, to make as much profit as possible.

Their customers have no choice or contract.

The provision, for our most vulnerable, in need of the most ‘people centred’ care is uncompetitive, unregulated, and, in secret.

Ever greedy, accounting machinations, can close these vulnerable people’s homes, and, end their workers’ jobs, overnight.

Neither, the Local Authority Commissioners, nor the Care Quality Commission, nor NHS England, have any effective control over the services, they commission.

And, there is, a conflict of interest, between their safeguarding, and commissioning remits, as if their commissioned services, are inadequate they are liable.

That is, if there were, any effective legal accountability, or, indeed, sanction.

And sharks, can, and are, making a killing, out of our most vulnerable, as the Southern Cross Healthcare debacle, illustrated.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1393294/Southern-Cross-Healthcare-destroyed-Stephen-Schwarzmans-private-equity-firm-Blackstone.html

Yet courts, local authorities, and, health trusts, continue to cost cut and spend billions of our money, not fulfilling, their statutory duties.

And, we continue to let them.

0_jLe33ZKodNIffjId

Parents of Autistics have no rights, and are unfairly blamed, Private Corporate Parents have all rights and are unaccountable

5653

Britain, is a desperately depressing place, if your child is autistic or learning disabled.

As you look at your beloved son or daughter, as you cuddle, and struggle, and sacrifice, remember, your time together is short, and limited by the state.

Remember to, you cannot protect them, from that state,

And, that state affords them no protection.

LB, Connor Sparrowhawk drowned in a bath, whilst having an epileptic fit, in an NHS Assessment and Treatment Unit, costing over £7,000 per week, ( now private £13,000), 4 staff to every 5 patients.

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/mar/19/connor-sparrowhawk-death-nhs-care-unit-slade-house-learning-disabilities

Despite, a highly publicised, two year long campaign and hundreds of thousands of public money spent investigating, no one will, or can be held responsible.

Stephanie Bincliffe, died at 25, weighing 25 stone in her sleep of heart failure.

The known side effects of her  anti- psychotic medication, weight gain, water retention, sedation, and, heart strain, were not mentioned.

Stephanie, spent the last two, of her 7 year, at least £5,000 a week,’ treatment’, in a padded cell, without being allowed out to bathe or toilet.

No effort made, to curb her weight, reduce her medication, for the two million, paid to the private company ‘treating’ her.

Her crime?

To be born an autistic cash cow, and  at 18  attacked a stranger, we do not know her reason, in a supermarket.

Shockingly the coroner found no neglect just failure to provide a care plan to reduce her weight.

The effect of her weight and her polypharmacy of medication on her death was not investigated.

The horror was revealed in June 2017 on national BBC News

So such ‘treatment’ will continue and be hidden better, as the industry grows and PR is perfected.

https://markneary1dotcom1.wordpress.com/2014/11/25/no-neglect/

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/24/hospital-autistic-woman-weight-gain-inquest

A similar fate, befell 20  year old Thomas Rawnsley, in an enforced under MCA, private Cambian Community Living ATU charging over £5,000 per week.

At 17, living at home Thomas was medicated, became violent, was sectioned and then forced to live in a supported living unit, where he was physically and mentally abused by his ‘carer’.

This abuse, and resultat  PTSD made him difficult to ‘care’ for, so he was medicated.

With such a high dosage, a chest infection, made it impossible for him to breath .

And his brain, starved of oxygen, stopped his heart.

His mother, cannot reveal details of his Coroners Inquest, or this LA commissioned care, as Thomas, was subject to the secret Court of Protection.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/02/11/corruption-and-abuse-of-autistics-for-profit/

http://www.drugdangers.com/Risperdal/

Many, many more deaths unknown.

3 daily,torture, and, unbearable suffering, has, and is being hidden, simply because, it occurs, in a multimillion pound, unaccountable, allowed to charge what it likes, industry.

And, all the ‘investigations’, are by the very establishment, who commissioned, created, support and profit from this industry.

So, they will use everything in their power, to hide the truth, and, not to blame drugs  or,  state care. https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/01/01/the-risperidone-scandal/

And the deaths, suffering, and, abuse will continue.

Unlike the USA, we do not have, an insurance based health and social care.

Although even in US private equity investment running disabled institutions has caused abuse see this https://newrepublic.com/article/125477/profit-abuse-homes-profoundly-disabled

But   in the UK, we have no insurance company, with a financial interest, fighting for the vulnerable.

And private actions  by parents are effectively impossible.

As parents, risk all assets even if the could find lawyers and experts.

Parents,  therefore, have  no means to ensure, profit hungry, private companies, ‘care’ for their children for life, let alone, allow them any quality of life, in now, the only adult services provision, of supported/independent living ?.

And the consumer of these services is declared legally incompetent by the very court,the Court of Protection that enforces the commissioned services of the LA.

Here, is the only  information, I could find, on the rights of parents of autistic adults from the National Autistic Society Website.

http://www.autism.org.uk/living-with-autism/at-home/caring-and-planning-for-the-future/parents-of-adults-with-autism-your-rights.aspx

it is considered inappropriate  for parents [ but not for corporate, profit making, parents] to make decisions on behalf of their children by this time in their lives’ [18, even if  they have the mental age of a young child ]

NHS and Community Care Act 1990, says:

“The individual service user and normally, with his or her agreement, [not needed, if Mental Capacity Act ‘incapable’, as most autistics illegally are] any carers [ we assume this means parents,, not paid support ?]  should be involved throughout the assessment and care management process. They should feel that the process is aimed at meeting their wishes.”

This means that care managers should consult parents when carrying out an initial assessment, and in recommending a PLACEMENT ( so your 18 year old cannot stay at home?)


but after that,  your rights as parents are not clear.

at any time, you are not happy with the services provided and feel that they are not suited to your child’s needs, you can complain either through the complaints procedure [ internal, so parents will get nowhere, and, risk all access to their child ] at your ( how are they still yours? ) child’s placement


or through the local authority [as they are commissioning agents, parents, will get no where, as the LA could then be sued], if they are funding the care

That about sums up, parents rights, and, theirs, and their child’s future.

Parents have no rights.

Nor, do the disabled service users.

So enjoy your children while you can.

Transition starts at 16.

Strangely,  NAS do not mention,  parents can obtain an Lasting Power of Attorney, allowing  them, to make decisions on behalf of their children, for the rest of their lives.

Or until the Court of Protection, overrides it.

Nor, your child’s right under the UN Article 12 Rights of the Disabled Convention, not to have all his decisions removed, because of his disability.

Or, his right to decide, where he lives, and be supported there.http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=279

And, his right to make his own decisions, and, not to have them illegally removed under the Mental Capacity Act  , and made by profit making private residential care provides in secret. http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=272

‘Raze out the written troubles of the brain’. The Myth and Horror of Mental Disease

Mquote-canst-thou-not-minster-to-a-mind-diseased-pluck-from-the-memory-a-rooted-sorrow-raze-out-the-william-shakespeare-384568

Psychiatry, is defined, as.

the diagnosis and treatment of mental diseases’.

‘Disease’ as a concept can only be defined in terms of its pathology.

Pathology  diagnoses disease from changes in cells, tissues, and body fluids.

Not even Schizophrenia, or psychosis, let alone, the recently created 375 mental ‘disorders’ have any pathology and therefore cannot be ‘diseases’.

And psychiatrists have had to admit  to this.

The difference between a medical diagnosis and a psychiatric diagnosis

Many academic and influential psychiatrists have written extensively on the non existence of mental illness per se, in books like ‘The Myth of Mental Illness’ by Thomas Szasz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Szasz

Once a putative disease,  that has a pathology like neurosyphilis, is diagnosed, it then becomes a physical not a mental disease.

The use today, of socially ‘acceptable’ conduct/behaviour, as the main  diagnosis of  mental ‘diseases’, is akin to its historic use, that categorised homosexuality as a disease of the brain.

And institutionalised unmarried mothers as social deviants.

It would appear, social control, and profit, are the reason for our third largest, burgeoning pharma industry, and mental health services, soon to be totally privatised. https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/12/16/mental-health-big-pharma-big-profits-big-danger/

It  is now possible, to label almost anything, as  a mental ‘disease’/disorder,- alcoholism, shyness, terrible twos, removing social responsibility, maintaining social control, and make profit from these new diseases, by fixing them with expensive, dangerous magic bullets, that cause more harm, than good

.http://www.cchrint.org/2011/07/29/harvard-expert-ties-mental-illness-epidemic-to-big-pharmas-agenda/

And, the side effects of this ‘disease cure’, itself, then causes pathological changes  in brain and body and even death.

We are insidiously brainwashed by TV soap operas, like Coronation St to believe, that these ‘diseases’, like depression/ADHD  are common, and can be miraculously cured by drugs.

Such medication, at best turn us into human robots, unable to emphasise or feel, or, at worst, has side effects, that will then be treated, with more dangerous magic bullets.

Rarely, are they the solution, except for a very short time preferably with counselling.

And their use, boosting the pharma industry, and our economy,  motivated, by unregulated profit.

The following blog comments, received from two mothers are just two of the millions affected.

Theirs, and their child’s horror, speaks for itself.

Pauline Thomas writes of her son’s medication

‘My son has been taking Carbamazepine for 25 years, and Lamotrogine for 19 years.

Both are anticonvulsants. Both also used has mood enhancers for people suffering with Bi-Polar My son has cerebral palsy, mostly down his left side and a learning disability.

My son was 17 when he was diagnosed with epilepsy after a hip operation. He was medicated on Carbamazapine, and for 5 years was seizure free.

We were coming to the decision to start taking them away, when he started having startle jumps whenever there was a loud noise or someone knocked against him. Sometimes these jumps led into a full blown seizure (tonic clonic).

It was then that he was medicated with Lamotrigine. Six months later he was getting moody and distressed. We did not realize then that Lamotrigine effected peoples moods. We were given help from psychologists.

In 2008 his seizures stopped. About the same time he was having aggressive outbursts and refusing to do anything or go anywhere. Sometimes they lasted for a few days, sometimes longer. At this time the day services in our borough were being pared down and outsourced to private companies. A disaster for him and many others.

Anyway in late 2012 we started to reduce his carbamazepine (he was on 1000mg daily).

Carbamazepine is an enzyme inducer. Any drug taken with Carbamazepine (Lamotrigine) would automatically begin to get stronger when you start to reduce CBZ.

I reminded the psychiatrist of this but he ignored me. Perhaps he thought I was talking out of turn?

The result was that a month after he was free of CBZ (in Jan 2014) he started to have terrible frightening hallucinations. He was terrified. He could not sleep. He was so scared.

We contacted his psychiatrist who said that he had never come across this type of reaction before but he believed my son was having a interictal reaction to his withdrawal of CBZ. I argued that he was most probably having a toxic reaction to Lamotrigine. His psychiatrist reinstated 400mg of carbamazepine.in two weeks. He recoverd for 3 weeks and then went back to be psychotic again but this time with the added side effect of ‘freeezing’ in the middle of doing anything. He would suddenly stop like a statue.

Telemetry showed no sign of any seizure activity. We have now began the long haul of getting rid all his medication. Lamotrigine is gone. We are now down to 400mg of CBZ.

The withdrawl symptoms are horrendous. Completely in a world of his own. Keeps talking about his days st college (20 years ago) with a focus on the same person. Her name and her parents and her sister going over and over in his head. It is like living with a completely different person

Carbamazepine has wrecked my son’s bones. He has osteoporosis. He has reduced white blood cells. (leucopenia). Both known side effects. He has little purple mauve spots on his body. Another known side effect which has been ignored by his psychiatrist. His psychiatrist suggested a while ago that my son should take biphosphonates to strengthen his bones. We refused, as we said we would not know if the drug would harm him, or if he was experiencing any side effects.

In America the drug company Merck was being sued by patients suffering with necrosis of the jaw and cancer of the oesophagus  after being on this drug.

We were threatened with the MCA

The doctor said if it could be proved that my son lacked capacity it could be taken out of our hands. This is why we cannot trust or like this doctor.

The doctor claims that my son is not suffering from withdrawal symptoms because antiepileptics have no known withdrawal symptoms.

He has reminded us however that they are mood enhancers.

We reminded him that our son was not mentally ill when he was given antiepileptic drugs.

My research tells me that Carbamazapine is related to the tricyclic group of drugs, which are antidepressants. There are withdrawal symptoms with antidepressants, especially if you have been on them for many years.

I recently purchased a book by American Dr. Peter Breggin called Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal, and one of his arguments is that

prescribers identify drugs according to the conditions that they are being used to treat rather than by their pharmacological category or characteristics, including their impact on the brain.

He also in his book refers to articles by Dr. Joanna Moncrieff.

I deplore that many of our children and loved ones are being used by the pharma and psychiatrist world as some sort of learning curve.

My son and many like him cannot fully explain what side effects they are having. Thank you Finola for exposing these cruel practices… ‘.

Another Mother, Cynthia Bartlett, wrote tragically of her son Charlie;.

‘ My son, Charlie, died two years ago of what I believe to be side effects from Risperdal given from age 15 until a few months before his death ay age 24.

I am really trying to start and do an investigative journalism piece on just this…Risperdal is routinely handed out here in Canada to children with autism.

I see one boy (on risperdal since age eight) in our small town, going down, exactly as my son did, starting with a strange gait and then rapid onset dystonia, losing swallowing and then dying from choking in the middle of the night.

I have accompanied the family to the neurologist to no avail’.

Our government, is at present debating, and, determined to introduce, an Assisted Suicide Act, legalising euthanasia.

One of  its clauses, could be, that if, all the MCA ‘incapable’, would have decided, to end their life, were they capable, the state can end it, for them.

Even, their body parts, can be used under MCA regulations.

This will mean no inquests, into why they died, even court deracinated family, need not be told of their death.

Parents of the MCA disappeared are not even afforded notification and a funeral.

There is no closure on parents’ lifetime horror of wondering what is happening or has happened to their child.

Today, literally by now thousands  of autistics and LD  are holed up in private NHS ‘hospitals’ and private care homes like Winterbourne View some managing to survive for decades.

All a statistic earning £4,500, for 24/7 surveillance, and medication.

What physical and mental state will they be in by now?

Imagine, the permanent effects of the long term drugs, they have been pumped full of, the horror is too much to contemplate but they and their families must daily.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/01/01/the-risperidone-scandal/

There are no future services/ life, for autistics, and, mentally disordered, except, as such encaged, cash cows.

The corporate/charity ‘independent’ living providers, need drugs, to enforce their ‘support’, as the system, does not allow, for individual care.

Shakespeare knew over 400 years ago no doctor could,

Raze out the written troubles of the brain.

As, Therein the patient Must minister to himself.’

And the autistic and learning disabled are not mentally ill.

But, these wise words were before big pharma and the realisation of the gold mine of mental disability.

Scientology_psychiatry_kills

Harvesting of the Disabled for Profit

A2013-09-20-15_36_14Parents of special educational needs children including those labelled autistic be warned this may be your fate.

The state are creating and labelling children as having a learning disability rather than a difficulty.

The renamed label is intellectual disability

See the latest number here.

http://schoolsweek.co.uk/schools-struggle-as-autism-diagnoses-rise-25-per-cent/

There are several databases used to share information illegally under Data Protection Act and s8 HRA to harvest children including future criminals.

http://databasemasterclass.blogspot.co.uk/

A learning (intellectual) ‘disability‘ is an impairment of mind, permanent, innate and evidenced by a low IQ  and is now  on the rise in the UK look at the statistics

http://chrishatton.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/the-disappeared.html?spref=tw.

Whereas a learning ‘difficulty‘ is not inate, and  can be because  a child is autistic ( learns differently), a late developer,  has poor teaching/assessment or taught in a second language,  such a child will have at least an average IQ. .

So if your child is a late developer autistic, has inadequate teaching he labelled and doomed to be a cash cow for life.

Unless he is part of the labelling state cabal.

Or in private education as they do not have the EHC system.

Education, Health, and Care Statements replaced Special Educational Needs statements last year.

Education, Health and Care statements unlike SEN, require social services to monitor your child’s ‘welfare’.

A school protection officer/ social worker will now be part of your life.

And,  your  child’s name secretly notified to  MASH- Multi Agency, Safeguarding Hub

Invasive IT Databases are being provided by CAPITA at 2016 see link.

In breach of HRA and Data Protection, to target families at risk in schools without their permission or even knowledge.

http://www.capita-one.co.uk/files/one/attachments/capita_one_-_product_brochure_-_one_analytics_-_apr16.pdf

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/working-together-to-safeguard-children-multi-agency-safeguarding-hubs

Your child will be in this system and by it watched covertly by every  agent of the state.

Read here the law and databases used to target the ‘disabled’ and their families by all agents of the state.

http://databasemasterclass.blogspot.co.uk/

And, despite the inherent difficulties of coping with an autistic./ different child.

Any bruise, scratch, dirt, swear  word, behaviour issue, sexualised behaviour, weight loss/gain,  head lice, old /inappropriate/clothing, emotional problem, parents relationship, lateness, rearrangement of meeting, attitude,comments, will be noted.

But you will be unaware you are under their microscope.

And have no right of reply or correction of their databases.

You will be impressed everyone  is taking such an interest.

Ignorant of why, your child really is, so ‘special’.

In June 2016 the government announced millions would be given to provide early intervention before crisis point.

This means those merely ‘at risk’ will also be targeted ie the poor, or those with relatives with special needs.

Education ‘pathways‘ are  used to harvest as many as possible to private eventually venture capital education and care .

As it is highly profitable- £200,000 a year financed by NHS (health), LA ( social),  D of E ( education )

.http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/business/acorn-care-acquires-pathway-care-9102370

All areas have similar Pathways as shown here for Nottingham

http://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/DMS/Document.ashx?czJKcaeAi5tUFL1DTL2UE4zNRBcoShgo=bSSB5VpG8vooSzX00hg%2FyPEcYUVxHpzqPrPXMJfEF%2BxGVODFeCYDfw%3D%3D&rUzwRPf%2BZ3zd4E7Ikn8Lyw%3D%3D=pwRE6AGJFLDNlh225F5QMaQWCtPHwdhUfCZ%2FLUQzgA2uL5jNRG4jdQ%3D%3D&mCTIbCubSFfXsDGW9IXnlg%3D%3D=hFflUdN3100%3D&kCx1AnS9%2FpWZQ40DXFvdEw%3D%3D=hFflUdN3100%3D&uJovDxwdjMPoYv%2BAJvYtyA%3D%3D=ctNJFf55vVA%3D&FgPlIEJYlotS%2BYGoBi5olA%3D%3D=NHdURQburHA%3D&d9Qjj0ag1Pd993jsyOJqFvmyB7X0CSQK=ctNJFf55vVA%3D&WGewmoAfeNR9xqBux0r1Q8Za60lavYmz=ctNJFf55vVA%3D&WGewmoAfeNQ16B2MHuCpMRKZMwaG1PaO=ctNJFf55vVA%3D

This intelligence gathering can be used to enforce any medication, therapy, schooling, or silence your complaints, via care proceeding or threat of them.

And serves as a file of historic ‘concerns’ of parental abuse/neglect/capacity, and/or future, Court of Protection LA evidence, that it is in your 18+ child’s ‘best interests’ to  be removed to community living for life, and your access limited and/or excluded.

Under EHC statements, your child can no longer attend a day school at 16, nor use overnight respite facilities.

His education, continues, by ad hoc, unaccountable, ‘independent’ living skills education packages

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/11/25/education-health-and-care-statements-emperors-clothes/

Consisting of agency workers,  escorting him to ad hoc skills facilities, overseen by a package boss.

Who, unknown to you are briefed on ‘your family’s file’ and will continue to monitor your child’s ‘welfare’.

Their goal,  is ‘independent’, away from home living and  is likely, to result, in a cash bonus, or, at least, more lucrative education packages from the LA.

‘Education’ will discuss leaving Mummy and Daddy, with your child.

Regardless of the effect or yours or his wishes.

And, you may not be told.

At 18, all services are funded by Adult Services.

Due to government cuts, these services are limited to assessment for state residential care for life- independent/ supported/community living,

A new private industry being bought up by monopoly venture capital US companies like Cygnet who own CAMBIAN with over 160 home sites.

http://www.local.gov.uk/documents/10180/5854661/Adult+social+care+funding+2014+state+of+the+nation+report/e32866fa-d512-4e77-9961-8861d2d93238.

This states,

‘The MODEL OF CARE, is increasingly one, which promotes INDEPENDENCE, and MANAGERS RISK.’ ( Code for ‘community’/supported living). 

Pressure, will be placed on the LA, to transfer adult funding to central government funding, which is only available, for residential Provision.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/04/27/independent-living-disabled-penned-for-profit/

The LA’s standard  adult support plan criteria eludes to this in a question the Adult Social Worker must complete;

Does the plan promote independence including identifying goals that could result in reducing paid support within an agreed period ?

Your child because of his learning difficulty will be treated as a ‘child in need’ under s17 Childrens  Act.

Children in need meetings will be held  with the education package, and, safeguarding issues  raised,- hygiene, clothing, food, parenting, medical and dental attendance, physical, sexual emotional  abuse,  and, placed in social services core assessments.

As, the LA funding can only decide, it is in your child’s ‘best interests’, to live away from you, and, your access limited, little in your favour, will be recorded.

No matter, how unfairly skewed against you, even if factually incorrect, it appears impossible, to change these assessments, and, relay  the correct information to professionals, and agencies.

The difficultly posed by your child’s disability, or, the inadequacy of support will not be considered.

The LA commission the services, and, it is liable, if inadequate.

Your ability to safeguard, parent, clean your home, and not neglect your child, will be judged, as if your child, were not disabled.

And, any possible concerns, re cleanliness/safeguarding/emotional abuse, real, or contrived,

Will be reported back, by support workers.

Whilst, your child’s disability, will not be considered, in assessing your parental capacity.

It will be, grossly exaggerated, by the LA in  their assessments of him,

To enable the maximum to be claimed from public funds to be paid to private  independent/community living providers.

The worse your child’s behave becomes or is made to appear, the greater the income  the independent/supported living provider  can claim.

This also is used as evidence you are unable to cope, and it is  in his ‘best interests’ he to be removed.

If you do get support, it will not be charged to help you, other than engage with your child.

But, support will be charged, to assess your capability, as a parent, and, whether you have a safe, clean, adequate home environment.

But you again, will be unaware of this. https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/10/14/gathering-evidence-from-social-https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/10/14/gathering-evidence-from-social-care/

Regular meeting s behind your back, will be held, between the social services, education, and, agency worker provider, who  have ‘your file’.

Your family, and child, will be whatever, they, in secret, decide.

Any information, you provide to workers/professionals, about your child, that does not fit the cabal’s purpose, of abuse, and neglect, safeguarding concerns will be ignored.

Support workers, on zero hour, minimum wage contracts, will be briefed, on the questions, to ask, and, matters to look out for.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/02/10/i-smell-a-rat/

Your family GP, will also  be part of the canal, and, despite confidentiality restrictions, both, your child’s medical records, and yours, will be shared.

Anything, that points to present or future parental physical, or mental incapacity, will be used to show, it is in your child’s ‘best interests’, to be removed to ‘independent’ living.

Any existent, or non-existent health, or mental concerns will be notified to your GP, by education, or, any agency, or social worker. https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/08/24/my-complaint-and-unaccountable-services/

To possibly gain support, as a carer, or, any respite, cleaning   etc, you will have to undergo a Carer’s assessment.

This is used to probe, every aspect of your physical and mental ‘wellbeing’.

But, the LA are not under a duty, to provide support, and, have no funds to do so.

And, will only consider it, if the affect on a carer’s wellbeing, is ‘severe’, which would then make a carer, unfit, and/or a risk to their chargee. https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/11/20/carers-act-2014-care-to-ensnare/

‘Concerns’, from support/education workers, are relayed to social services.

And sought expressly, by leading questioning.

And covertly, by tricks and grooming.

You will consider them all your friends, until without notice they disappear.

They will not raise their concerns with you.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/01/31/education-report-a-red-mark-the-size-of-a-fist/

These ‘concerns’, will be placed in court statements,to prevent you representing your child in court as you are cast as abuser/neglector there is a conflict of interests between you and your child.,

And, show, it is in his ‘best interests’, to be removed from you and your contact limited.

You will only discover, their ‘concerns’, on reading your social worker’s  court statement, in support of s48 Mental Capacity Act Interim application to the Court of Protection.

Your child will be forced, if necessary, by a court order, to undergo a psychological assessment, paid for by the LA.

This will assess, any deemed emotional abuse your child is subjected to at home, and a blanket, illegal capacity test.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/03/03/standard-capacity-assessments-stephen-hawking-would-fail-without-his-box/

This will state, that due to your child’s ‘intellectual disability’, he is, and has always been, unable to make any decisions.

It is now assumed that children subject to a SEN now EHC statement will be incapable under MCA and conferences for SEN families give presentations to that effect on Transition ie 16-18, see here

https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/sites/default/files/Transition%20seminar%20FINAL%20(2).pdf

Your child has now been made, the perfect commodity for life, for the multibillion pound, unaccountable, independent living industry.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2015/05/31/the-mental-capacity-act-in-practice-emancipated-or-insentient/

Where he is safely behind the closed doors of the state where abuse  or even death is not investigated.

Your GP, will  look for signs of neglect, weight loss, bed sores, skin conditions, abuse, and self -harm.

https://finolamoss.wordpress.com/2014/09/25/a-voice-crying-in-the-wilderness/

If you proffer other causes, this may be evidence of fabricated disorder/ Munchausen.

Your GP, will be instructed by the Court of Protection, to do a  physical examination of your child, under s49 MCA, whether necessary, or not, and, any other assessments.

And, regardless of the distress, it causes.

His letter of instruction, will state, that the LA have concerns, and, that you have denied access, to your child, weather proved, or not.

Once the Court, becomes involved, any support workers, will become overt assessors.

All care agencies, and day centres, are funded by the LA, and therefore, controlled by them.

And as, ‘independent’ away from home living, is now the LA’s, only policy, for adult social care, all feed into it.

Despite, his EU, United Nations Rights not, to have the state remove his right to make decisions,http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=279

Here is an OFSTED report in 2016 showing the shambles SEN is in there.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/575666/Joint_local_area_SEND_inspection_in_Surrey.pdf

You, and your child are flies in a sealed LA web.

The government’s Transforming Care document proposes early intervention for the autistic and learning disabled who evidence ‘challenging behaviour  and contains the following statistics;.

There are an estimated 1.2 million people in England, of which 286,000 are children and young people under the age of 18, with a learning disability (Emerson et al. 2012).

This means that roughly 20 people in every thousand have a learning disability (2-3% of the general population). The majority live their lives without support from specialist learning disability services – for instance, of the roughly 1 million adults with a learning disability, it is estimated that 189,000 (21%) (Emerson et al. 2012) are known to learning disability services.

There are an estimated 700,000 people with autism in England (Brugha et al. 2012) of which 125,000 are children and young people under the age of 18 (Baird et al. 2006).

This means that roughly 11 people in every thousand have autism (1.1% of the general population). It is estimated that 44%-52% of people with autism also have a learning disability (Emerson et al. 2010).

Those who display behaviour that challenges Challenging behaviours are generally understood to be exhibited by 10-15% of adults with learning disabilities known to services (approx. 22-34,000 people), whilst often peaking between the ages of 20-49 (Emerson et al. 2001).

A further 40,000 of children under the age of 18 are believed to display challenging behaviour (Emerson et al 2014).

As set out in Challenging Behaviour: A Unified Approach (Royal College of Psychiatrists, et al, 2007, p.14) challenging behaviour is behaviour

of such an intensity, frequency or duration as to threaten the quality of life and/or the physical safety of the individual or others and is likely to lead to responses that are restrictive, aversive or result in exclusion”.

 

Determined to harvest your child.spider-net-g8i1